1968
DOI: 10.1080/03634526809377640
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Oral interpretation and secondary teachers of English

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1998
1998
1998
1998

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 2 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, face-to-face conversation is still the most common form of communication among persons in our society, yet few language arts teachers ever consider giving instruction on how to create persuasive speeches, how to listen properly, how to offer useful criticisms, or how to use the voice and body to achieve a desired effect (Fernandez 1969;Herman andRatliffe 1972, Moffett andWagner 1992;Holdzkom, Reed, Porter, and Rubin 1985;Spolin 1983). As with writing, appropriate elocution and diction are dependent upon audience and purpose, and effort should be devoted to having students develop a repertoire of effective methods of oral expression.…”
Section: Speech and Dramamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, face-to-face conversation is still the most common form of communication among persons in our society, yet few language arts teachers ever consider giving instruction on how to create persuasive speeches, how to listen properly, how to offer useful criticisms, or how to use the voice and body to achieve a desired effect (Fernandez 1969;Herman andRatliffe 1972, Moffett andWagner 1992;Holdzkom, Reed, Porter, and Rubin 1985;Spolin 1983). As with writing, appropriate elocution and diction are dependent upon audience and purpose, and effort should be devoted to having students develop a repertoire of effective methods of oral expression.…”
Section: Speech and Dramamentioning
confidence: 99%