2009
DOI: 10.1515/iral.2009.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Oral interaction in task-based EFL learning: The use of the L1 as a cognitive tool

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

13
90
1
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 137 publications
(108 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
13
90
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This is a feature noted in many foreign language settings, where learners are able to use a shared L1 (e.g. Alegría de la Colina & García Mayo, 2009;Brooks, Donato, & McGlone, 1997;Hancock, 1997;Tognini, 2008) as a common linguistic resource to resolve linguistic difficulties and minimally interrupt communicative flow. Although not addressed in this study, some research suggests the L1 can be a positive resource for learners, both for metacognition and, particularly for lower-proficiency learners, as a means of sustaining task engagement Downloaded by [York University Libraries] at 09:13 20 November 2014 (Tognini, Philp, & Oliver, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is a feature noted in many foreign language settings, where learners are able to use a shared L1 (e.g. Alegría de la Colina & García Mayo, 2009;Brooks, Donato, & McGlone, 1997;Hancock, 1997;Tognini, 2008) as a common linguistic resource to resolve linguistic difficulties and minimally interrupt communicative flow. Although not addressed in this study, some research suggests the L1 can be a positive resource for learners, both for metacognition and, particularly for lower-proficiency learners, as a means of sustaining task engagement Downloaded by [York University Libraries] at 09:13 20 November 2014 (Tognini, Philp, & Oliver, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This gave students the chance to exchange ideas, negotiate meaning, and engage in collaborative scaffolding within a small group of peers before venturing their answers in English to the class in general. Similarly, Alegría de la Colina and Del Pilar García Mayo (2009) argue that the first language can provide cognitive support for focusing attention and understanding meaning, thus enabling fruitful interaction and collaboration between participants and facilitating the pursuit of a common goal. Students in this study were not discouraged from using Spanish while discussing the novel within literature circles, and participants pointed out that Spanish served as a bridge that helped them communicate their thoughts and clarify any doubts they might have had in a way that the target language alone would not have.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For reasons such as the above, many researchers have begun to question the notion of the monolingual principle and have begun to investigate ways in which the L1 could be used as a teaching and learning tool in the language classroom (Cook 2001;de la Colina and del Pilar García Mayo 2009;Lewis, Jones and Baker 2012). Baker (2011: 291) contends that the strict application of the monolingual principle in language learning contexts belongs to the 20 th century, 'while the 21 st century will see the deliberate and systematic use of both languages in the classroom'.…”
Section: The L1 In the Language Classroom?mentioning
confidence: 99%