Oral immunization with recombinant Salmonella typhimurium expressing surface protein antigen A (SpaA) of Streptococcus sobrinus: effects of the Salmonella virulence plasmid on the induction of protective and sustained humoral responses in rats

Redman, Tamara K.; Harmon, Christian; Michalek, Suzanne M.

doi:10.1016/0264-410x(96)00013-8

Cited by 21 publications

(21 citation statements)

References 53 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…For i.g. immunization, mice received the bacteria in 0.25 ml of the intubation medium with the aide of a 22-gauge feeding tube (5,29). Mice immunized with serovar Typhimurium BRD509(pTETnir15) clone, which expresses an unrelated antigen (fragment C of tetanus toxin [TetC]) served as a negative control for both the immunization study and the study on the inhibition of S. mutans infection.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Induction of Protective Immunity againstStreptococcus mutansColonization after Mucosal Immunization with AttenuatedSalmonella entericaSerovar Typhimurium Expressing anS. mutansAdhesin under the Control of In Vivo-InduciblenirBPromoter

Huang¹,

Hajishengallis

Michalek³

2001

Infect Immun

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the effectiveness of an attenuated Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium vaccine strain expressing the saliva-binding region (SBR) of the Streptococcus mutans antigen I/II adhesin, either alone or linked with the mucosal adjuvant cholera toxin A2 and B subunits (CTA2/B) and under the control of the anaerobically inducible nirB promoter, in inducing a protective immune response against S. mutans infection. BALB/c mice were immunized by either the intranasal or the intragastric route with a single dose of 10 9 or 10 10 Salmonella CFU, respectively. The Salmonella vaccine strain expressing an unrelated antigen (fragment C of tetanus toxin [TetC]) was also used for immunization as a control. Samples of serum and secretion (saliva and vaginal washes) were collected prior to and following immunization and assessed for antibody activity by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Anti-SBR antibodies were detected in the serum and saliva of experimental animals by week 3 after immunization. A booster immunization at week 17 after the initial immunization resulted in enhanced immune responses to the SBR. The serum immunoglobulin G subclass profiles were indicative of T helper type 1 responses against both the vector and the SBR antigen. To determine the effectiveness of these responses on the protection against S. mutans infection, mice were challenged after the second immunization with a virulent strain of S. mutans which was resistant to tetracycline and erythromycin. Prior to the challenge, mice were treated for 5 days with tetracycline, erythromycin, and penicillin. S. mutans was initially recovered from all of the challenged mice. This bacterium persisted at high levels for at least 5 weeks in control TetC-immunized or nonimmunized mice despite the reappearance of indigenous oral organisms. However, mice immunized with Salmonella clones expressing SBR or SBR-CTA2/B demonstrated a significant reduction in the number of S. mutans present in plaque compared to the control groups. These results provide evidence for the effectiveness of the Salmonella vector in delivering the SBR antigen for the induction of mucosal and systemic immune responses to SBR. Furthermore, the induction of a salivary anti-SBR response corresponded with protection against S. mutans colonization of tooth surfaces.

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Induction of Protective Immunity againstStreptococcus mutansColonization after Mucosal Immunization with AttenuatedSalmonella entericaSerovar Typhimurium Expressing anS. mutansAdhesin under the Control of In Vivo-InduciblenirBPromoter

Huang¹,

Hajishengallis

Michalek³

2001

Infect Immun

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Little work has been performed to characterize the contribution of bacterial virulence determinants to pathogenesis in either the guinea pig or rat models, although it is known that flagellum and fimbria genes are not implicitly required for virulence of Salmonella Enteritidis in rats (75). The rat model has been used to determine immune responses to Salmonella vector vaccines (77)(78)(79) and has in one case been used to establish immunogenicity and protection of a Salmonella Enteritidis ghost particle vaccine (80).…”

Section: Systemic Infection Small Animal Modelsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Animal Models for Salmonellosis: Applications in Vaccine Research

Higginson

Simon

Tennant

2016

Clin Vaccine Immunol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Salmonellosis remains an important cause of human disease worldwide. While there are several licensed vaccines for Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi, these vaccines are generally ineffective against other Salmonella serovars. Vaccines that target paratyphoid and nontyphoidal Salmonella serovars are very much in need. Preclinical evaluation of candidate vaccines is highly dependent on the availability of appropriate scientific tools, particularly animal models. Many different animal models exist for various Salmonella serovars, from whole-animal models to smaller models, such as those recently established in insects. Here, we discuss various mouse, rat, rabbit, calf, primate, and insect models for Salmonella infection, all of which have their place in research. However, choosing the right model is imperative in selecting the best vaccine candidates for further clinical testing. In this minireview, we summarize the various animal models that are used to assess salmonellosis, highlight some of the advantages and disadvantages of each, and discuss their value in vaccine development.A nimal models are indispensable tools for assessing candidate vaccines, with preclinical animal safety, immunogenicity, and efficacy data being prerequisite for regulatory agencies such as the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) prior to undertaking early-stage clinical trials. However, not all animal models are created equal. While some models are highly robust and closely mimic clinical infection, others are contrived and far removed from clinical relevance. Choosing the right animal model for the vaccine under investigation is imperative in determining its safety and/or effectiveness.Salmonella spp. are often used as model organisms to study bacterial pathogenesis and host-microbe interactions, due to the ability of certain Salmonella serovars to readily infect animals. As such, there are a myriad of animal models available to vaccine developers. These range from colonization or lethality models to those involving complex surgical techniques (Table 1). The choice of model is often related not only to relevance but also cost, ethics, housing requirements, and the availability of appropriate technical expertise. While most researchers utilize one model or another, integration of data from multiple animal models can provide a more complete understanding of the safety of a candidate vaccine and/or predict how a potential vaccine may perform in humans. In this minireview, we provide background on Salmonella clinical syndromes and pathogenesis and then summarize the various animal models that have been used for Salmonella vaccine research. We include a brief discussion of the technical aspects, advantages, and limitations of each model, followed by a review of the literature surrounding its use in vaccine evaluation. While there has been considerable development for veterinary Salmonella vaccines, here we will focus solely on vaccines and models for human salmonellosis.

show abstract

“…Immunization of mice with synthetic peptides (residues 301-319) from the alanine-rich region of antigen I/II suppressed tooth colonization with S. mutans (Takahashi et al, 1991). Immunization with S. sobrinus SpaA constructs protected rats from caries caused by S. sobrinus infection (Redman et al, 1995). Protection in these experiments could conceivably occur by antibody blockade of initial colonization events or antibody-mediated agglutination and clearing of adhesinbearing bacteria from the saliva.…”

Section: (A) Adhesinsmentioning

confidence: 84%

Dental Caries Vaccines: Prospects and Concerns

Smith¹

2002

Critical Reviews in Oral Biology & Medicine

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Dental caries remains one of the most common infectious diseases of mankind. Cariogenic micro-organisms enter the dental biofilm early in life and can subsequently emerge, under favorable environmental conditions, to cause disease. In oral fluids, adaptive host defenses aroused by these infections are expressed in the saliva and gingival crevicular fluid. This review will focus on methods by which mucosal host defenses can be induced by immunization to interfere with dental caries caused by mutans streptococci. The natural history of mutans streptococcal colonization is described in the context of the ontogeny of mucosal immunity to these and other indigenous oral streptococci. Molecular targets for dental caries vaccines are explored for their effectiveness in intact protein and subunit (synthetic peptide, recombinant and conjugate) vaccines in pre-clinical studies. Recent progress in the development of mucosal adjuvants and viable and non-viable delivery systems for dental caries vaccines is described. Finally, the results of clinical trials are reviewed, followed by a discussion of the prospects and concerns of human application of the principles presented.

show abstract

Oral immunization with recombinant Salmonella typhimurium expressing surface protein antigen A (SpaA) of Streptococcus sobrinus: effects of the Salmonella virulence plasmid on the induction of protective and sustained humoral responses in rats

Cited by 21 publications

References 53 publications

Induction of Protective Immunity againstStreptococcus mutansColonization after Mucosal Immunization with AttenuatedSalmonella entericaSerovar Typhimurium Expressing anS. mutansAdhesin under the Control of In Vivo-InduciblenirBPromoter

Induction of Protective Immunity againstStreptococcus mutansColonization after Mucosal Immunization with AttenuatedSalmonella entericaSerovar Typhimurium Expressing anS. mutansAdhesin under the Control of In Vivo-InduciblenirBPromoter

Animal Models for Salmonellosis: Applications in Vaccine Research

Dental Caries Vaccines: Prospects and Concerns

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About