2013
DOI: 10.1017/s0007114513002791
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Oral Lactobacillus reuteri GMN-32 treatment reduces blood glucose concentrations and promotes cardiac function in rats with streptozotocin-induced diabetes mellitus

Abstract: Impaired regulation of blood glucose levels in diabetes mellitus (DM) patients and the associated elevation of blood glucose levels are known to increase the risk of diabetic cardiomyopathy (DC). In the present study, a probiotic bacterium, Lactobacillus reuteri GMN-32, was evaluated for its potential to reduce blood glucose levels and to provide protection against DC risks in streptozotocin (STZ)-induced DM rats. The blood glucose levels of the STZ-induced DM rats when treated with L. reuteri GMN-32 decreased… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
19
1
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
2
19
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Davari et al (2013) and Lin et al (2014) reported a significant de crease in glucose levels inanimals receiving a probiotic mix containing Lactobacillusacidophilus, Bifidobacterium lactis and Lactobacillusfermentum and Lactobacillus reuteri, respectively,compared with diabetic controls, as was seen in this study. Tabuchi et al (2003) and Yadav et al (2008) observed animprovement in glucose tolerance following Lactobacillusrhamnosus GG, L. acidophilus and Lactobacillus caseisupplementation, whereas Zarfeshani et al (2011) foundno significant differences in blood glucose levels followingL.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Davari et al (2013) and Lin et al (2014) reported a significant de crease in glucose levels inanimals receiving a probiotic mix containing Lactobacillusacidophilus, Bifidobacterium lactis and Lactobacillusfermentum and Lactobacillus reuteri, respectively,compared with diabetic controls, as was seen in this study. Tabuchi et al (2003) and Yadav et al (2008) observed animprovement in glucose tolerance following Lactobacillusrhamnosus GG, L. acidophilus and Lactobacillus caseisupplementation, whereas Zarfeshani et al (2011) foundno significant differences in blood glucose levels followingL.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Ultimately, 33 articles were included in the final analysis, consisting of five human and 28 animal reports . Information on human and animal studies in relation to methodological quality, characteristics of participants, interventions and outcome measures are summarized in Tables and .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Twelve animal reports of the selected articles assessed plasma and serum glucose levels without obtaining fasting or postprandial glucose measurements. Six of them reported significant reduction in plasma glucose levels after probiotic interventions , which conducted over 2 , four , 8 and 12 weeks of interventions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, L. reuteri 6475 treatment did not significantly affect the levels of inflammation markers (TNF‐α and hsCRP) in this trial. Other strains of L. reuteri have also been reported to reduce blood glucose levels in diabetic mice , and prevent obesity in a mouse model of the metabolic syndrome . Many studies have pointed to an association between gut microbiota and systemic metabolism , but in the present study, treatment with L. reuteri 6475 had no significant effect on HbA1c or body composition.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%