This paper presents my reflections on the use of critical oral history method for a participatory, community-based international LGBT human rights research project. Although critical oral history method has been promoted as an empowering research method particularly suited to advocacy work, I describe emerging dilemmas around naming the work, assuming risks and understanding the method as a medium with potential for reifying existing power imbalances. I advocate for more complicated understandings of how critical research is not defined by the method, but instead, by the processes surrounding it.