Oral health related quality-of-life outcomes of partially edentulous patients treated with implant-supported single crowns or fixed partial dentures

Alzarea, Bader K

doi:10.4317/jced.53661

Cited by 21 publications

(22 citation statements)

References 26 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The outcomes support the observed clinical findings (healthy peri‐implant tissues) and the relatively low number of technical complications. Longer‐term studies on dental implant therapy with or without sinus grafting applying OHIP questionnaires revealed similar decreasing OHIP values during the follow‐up after successful therapy (AlZarea, ; Petricevic, Celebic, & Rener‐Sitar, ; Schiegnitz et al., ). The observed OHIP values then tend to reach values similar to the ones of healthy subjects without any need for treatment (John, Micheelis, & Biffar, ), thereby revealing an increased patient satisfaction.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 86%

Randomized controlled multicentre study comparing short dental implants (6 mm) versus longer dental implants (11–15 mm) in combination with sinus floor elevation procedures: 5‐Year data

Thoma

Haas

Sporniak‐Tutak³

et al. 2018

J Clinic Periodontology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Aim:To compare the implant survival rate between short dental implants and standard length implants placed in combination with bone grafting at 5 years of loading. Methods: This multicentre study enrolled 101 patients (137 implants) with a posterior maxillary bone height of 5-7 mm. Patients randomly received either short implants (6 mm; GS) or long implants (11-15 mm) with sinus grafting (GG). Six months later, implants were loaded with single crowns and patients re-examined at 1, 3 and 5 years of loading. Outcomes included: implant survival, marginal bone levels (MBLs), biological and technical parameters and patient-reported outcome measures (OHIP-49 = Oral Health Impact Profile). Statistical analysis was performed using a nonparametric approach.Results: At 5 years, 90 patients (124 implants; GS: 60; GG: 64) were re-examined (drop-out rate 10%). Patient-level implant survival rates were 98.5% (GS; 1 implant failure) and 100% (GG; p = 0.49). Mean MBLs were 0.54 mm ± 0.87 (GS) and 0.46 mm ± 1.00 (GG; p = 0.34). Biological and technical parameters were not significantly different (p > 0.05). Median overall OHIP-49 scores improved significantly up to 5 years in both groups (GS: p = 0.03; GG: p = 0.00; intergroup comparison p = 0.11). Conclusions:Both treatment modalities were suitable for implant therapy in the atrophied posterior maxilla revealing no differences in terms of survival rates, marginal bone levels (changes), patient-reported outcomes and technical/biological complications.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 86%

Randomized controlled multicentre study comparing short dental implants (6 mm) versus longer dental implants (11–15 mm) in combination with sinus floor elevation procedures: 5‐Year data

Thoma

Haas

Sporniak‐Tutak³

et al. 2018

J Clinic Periodontology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Since the first titanium implant was placed in humans in 1965, implant therapy has become very popular and has been proven to be a predictable and successful treatment option to replace missing teeth . However, bone resorption and ridge dimension changes following tooth extraction can challenge clinicians’ ability to provide a restorative‐driven implant placement.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Evaluation of healing at molar extraction sites with and without ridge preservation: A three‐arm histologic analysis

Duong

Mealey

Walker

et al. 2019

Journal of Periodontology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Little evidence is available regarding the benefit of ridge preservation (RP) at molar sites. The primary objective of this three‐arm cohort study was to histologically compare the healing outcome between natural healing after molar tooth extraction and two different techniques of RP using freeze‐dried bone allograft (FDBA) and a nonresorbable dense polytetrafluoroethylene (dPTFE) membrane, or an absorbable collagen sponge as a barrier. Methods Seventy‐nine patients requiring extraction and delayed implant placement were placed into three groups: extraction alone (control); ridge preserved using FDBA; and either dPTFE (Test1) or collagen sponge (Test2). Bone cores were harvested from implant osteotomies at ≈3 months after extraction for histomorphometric analysis to determine the percentage of vital bone, residual graft, and connective or other tissue. Ridge dimension changes were also evaluated radiographically (cone‐beam computed tomography). Results The percentage of vital bone was significantly greater in control group compared with Test1 but was not statistically different among other groups. Test2 showed significantly less connective or other tissue than control and Test1. The percentage of residual graft was significantly lower in Test1 compared with Test2. There was no significant correlation between the percentage of vital bone or residual graft and the following parameters: healing time, patient age, gender, buccal plate thickness, or radiographic changes in ridge dimensions. Conclusion RP at molar sites using FDBA and an absorbable collagen sponge may be a sufficient and economic way to preserve the ridge dimension without interfering with the amount of new bone formation.

show abstract

“…Many studies have investigated patients’ expectations and satisfaction with different prosthetic treatments, such as removable dentures and implant‐supported FDPs . However, the dental literature still lacks consensus about predictors of patient satisfaction for different types of prosthetic rehabilitations, as well as the influence of different types of prosthetic treatment on patients’ expectations and satisfaction.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Patient Expectation and Satisfaction with Different Prosthetic Treatment Modalities

Colvin

Dawson

et al. 2018

Journal of Prosthodontics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose To investigate the relationships between gender, age, patients’ perceptions about the dentists’ conduct, number of adjustments, treatment type, and expectation prior to prosthetic treatment and patient satisfaction with their treatments. Materials and Methods Data were integrated from four studies that measured patient expectations before treatment and satisfaction after treatment using a visual analog scale (VAS) from 0 to 10. These scores were given for each of four aspects of the therapeutic outcomes: chewing, esthetics, phonetics, and comfort. Patients’ perceptions about the dentists’ conduct was also assessed using a Likert‐scale questionnaire. The total sample size, after combining the data from all four studies, was 223 subjects. Bivariate and multivariable analyses were performed. The covariates entertained were gender, age, treatment type, patients’ perceptions about the dentists’ conduct, number of adjustments, and expectation prior to denture fabrication. Results In the entire sample, 115 (51.57%) patients were females and 108 (48.43%) were males. They ranged in age from 28 to 81 years old; the mean age was 53.2 years (SD = 11.5). Combining four treatments together, there was no significant difference between patients’ expectation and satisfaction scores for all four items. There were no significant differences between expectation and satisfaction for different genders. Multivariable analysis showed that patient expectation, satisfaction and the difference (satisfaction score–expectation score) scores for all four aspects were associated with treatment type (implant treatments were favored), and expectation prior to prosthetic treatment (the higher the expectation, the higher the satisfaction) was associated with satisfaction and difference scores. Satisfaction and difference scores for chewing were associated with number of adjustments and satisfaction, and satisfaction and difference scores for phonetics and comfort were associated with how well the dentist explained the intended treatment before performing it. Conclusions Patient satisfaction was associated with treatment type (implant treatments were favored), expectations prior to prosthetic treatment (the higher the expectation, the higher the satisfaction), and how well the dentist explained the intended treatment before performing it.

show abstract

Oral health related quality-of-life outcomes of partially edentulous patients treated with implant-supported single crowns or fixed partial dentures

Cited by 21 publications

References 26 publications

Randomized controlled multicentre study comparing short dental implants (6 mm) versus longer dental implants (11–15 mm) in combination with sinus floor elevation procedures: 5‐Year data

Randomized controlled multicentre study comparing short dental implants (6 mm) versus longer dental implants (11–15 mm) in combination with sinus floor elevation procedures: 5‐Year data

Evaluation of healing at molar extraction sites with and without ridge preservation: A three‐arm histologic analysis

Patient Expectation and Satisfaction with Different Prosthetic Treatment Modalities

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About