2006
DOI: 10.1258/004947506776593477
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Oral health in rural South African type 2 diabetic patients

Abstract: Objectives: According to The World Oral Health Report 2003, oral diseases remain a major public health problem worldwide. However, oral health is seen as a very low priority in the African Region, where extreme poverty means that the limited resources available to the health sector are directed towards life-threatening conditions such as HIV/AIDS, tuberculosis and malaria. The mission of the Oral Health Programme at the Regional Office of WHO for Africa is to assist Member States to achieve those goals by mean… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
13
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
1
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…One prospective study conducted with T1D did not show any association between the degree of glycemic control and PD but a positive association with local oral hygiene measures 82 , and another study, that was cross-sectional, has regarded this association 102 . Five of the seven reports published regarding the association between glycemic control and PD in T2D 10,43,59,75,106 have found this association and two did not 12,80 . We have found five studies providing information on the differences in periodontal health in groups of mixed types of diabetes 5,37,45,61,68 ; three have found this association 37,61,68 and two did not 5,45 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…One prospective study conducted with T1D did not show any association between the degree of glycemic control and PD but a positive association with local oral hygiene measures 82 , and another study, that was cross-sectional, has regarded this association 102 . Five of the seven reports published regarding the association between glycemic control and PD in T2D 10,43,59,75,106 have found this association and two did not 12,80 . We have found five studies providing information on the differences in periodontal health in groups of mixed types of diabetes 5,37,45,61,68 ; three have found this association 37,61,68 and two did not 5,45 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Primary research reports in the literature published since 2000 investigating relationships between glycemic control level and periodontal disease have included studies with subjects with type 1 diabetes exclusively (one study), type 2 diabetes exclusively (seven studies), or a combination of individuals with either type 1 or type 2 diabetes (three studies) (Table 2). Only seven of the 12 reports published regard the association between degree of glycemic control and periodontal disease specifically in type 2 diabetes (Sandberg et al , 2000; Tsai et al , 2002; Lu and Yang, 2004; Campus et al , 2005; Chuang et al , 2005; Jansson et al , 2006; Peck et al , 2006) . Five of the latter found poorer glycemic control to be a significant factor associated with poorer periodontal health, the association was borderline significant in one study of dialysis patients (Chuang et al , 2005) and no difference was found in the remaining study (Sandberg et al , 2000).…”
Section: Diabetes Mellitus and Its Effects On Periodontal Diseasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Five of the latter found poorer glycemic control to be a significant factor associated with poorer periodontal health, the association was borderline significant in one study of dialysis patients (Chuang et al , 2005) and no difference was found in the remaining study (Sandberg et al , 2000). Among the studies providing information on differences in periodontal health classified by glycemic control status, most have been cross‐sectional, with eight of 12 publications reporting more prevalent or more severe periodontal disease in those with poorer glycemic control (Tervonen et al , 2000; Tsai et al , 2002; Guzman et al , 2003; Lu and Yang, 2004; Negishi et al , 2004; Campus et al , 2005; Jansson et al , 2006; Peck et al , 2006) and four reporting no differences (Sandberg et al , 2000; Arrieta‐Blanco et al , 2003; Karikoski and Murtomaa, 2003; Chuang et al , 2005). There was one follow‐up study identified (evidence level II‐2) that was published since 2000 (Karikoski and Murtomaa, 2003).…”
Section: Diabetes Mellitus and Its Effects On Periodontal Diseasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…), small sample size (Peck et al. , Javed et al. ), and lack of a constant, globally accepted HbA1c cut‐off value to define poorly controlled diabetes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%