The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2023
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd010956.pub3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Oral direct thrombin inhibitors or oral factor Xa inhibitors versus conventional anticoagulants for the treatment of deep vein thrombosis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 185 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are several limitations to the findings of this systematic review 2 . The overall outcome event rates were low, resulting in wide CIs and limited precision, though heterogeneity was low for all reported outcomes.…”
Section: Caveatsmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…There are several limitations to the findings of this systematic review 2 . The overall outcome event rates were low, resulting in wide CIs and limited precision, though heterogeneity was low for all reported outcomes.…”
Section: Caveatsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…If DVT is not appropriately managed, the thrombus may progress or dislodge leading to pulmonary embolism (PE). DVT was traditionally treated with heparin and vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) 2–4 . However, oral direct thrombin inhibitors (DTIs) and oral factor Xa inhibitors, broadly known as direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), demonstrate several characteristics that may be favorable to heparin and VKAs.…”
Section: Narrativementioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations