2011
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2010.10108.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Oral aprepitant in the therapy of refractory pruritus in erythrodermic cutaneous T-cell lymphoma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
63
1
3

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
63
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…A recent study showed that aprepitant, a substance P receptor (NK1) antagonist, significantly inhibits scratching behavior in the NC/Nga mouse model of atopic dermatitis (101). More importantly, clinical studies demonstrated that aprepitant is effective for treating chronic pruritus, especially in patients with therapy-refractory pruritus (18, 128, 146). The inhibitory effect of this NK1 receptor antagonist could be caused by inhibition of substance P in the periphery or by blockage of NK1 + neurons in the dorsal spinal cord, which are involved in transmitting the itch sensation.…”
Section: Peripheral Itch Mediators and Related Receptorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent study showed that aprepitant, a substance P receptor (NK1) antagonist, significantly inhibits scratching behavior in the NC/Nga mouse model of atopic dermatitis (101). More importantly, clinical studies demonstrated that aprepitant is effective for treating chronic pruritus, especially in patients with therapy-refractory pruritus (18, 128, 146). The inhibitory effect of this NK1 receptor antagonist could be caused by inhibition of substance P in the periphery or by blockage of NK1 + neurons in the dorsal spinal cord, which are involved in transmitting the itch sensation.…”
Section: Peripheral Itch Mediators and Related Receptorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been used for itch in T-cell lymphoma, mycosis fungoides, solid tumors and itch related to biological cancer treatment (51)(52)(53)(54)(55) in an oral dose of 80-125 mg/day.…”
Section: Diagnostics and Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A response was achieved in 80% of these patients, with reductions in both the DLQI and VAS scores. Although these differences were not statistically significant, in view of the small number of patients, they were quantifiable [10]. …”
Section: Case Presentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In none of the studies reviewed was any evidence found of adverse reactions that might have resulted from the continued use of aprepitant [7-10]. …”
Section: Case Presentationmentioning
confidence: 99%