PsycEXTRA Dataset 1999
DOI: 10.1037/e575832012-001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Oral and Written Symbol Comprehension Testing: The Benefit of Cognitive Interview Probing

Abstract: BRANTLEY, KIMBERLY. Oral and Written Symbol Comprehension Testing: The Benefit of Cognitive Interview Probing. (Under the direction of Michael Wogalter.) Traditionally, symbol comprehension is tested using open-ended, written responses. However, responses are often so brief that they may fail to indicate a participant's true understanding of some symbols. In the present study, several test methods were compared to the standard written method to determine if they produce better symbol comprehension performance.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
(4 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The principal investigator assessed comprehension using the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) 9186 method for testing comprehensibility of symbols, 50 modified for verbal administration. 51 The investigator first showed a "No Smoking Within 25 Feet" symbol and delivered the following script:…”
Section: Phase II Individual Comprehension Assessment Interviewsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The principal investigator assessed comprehension using the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) 9186 method for testing comprehensibility of symbols, 50 modified for verbal administration. 51 The investigator first showed a "No Smoking Within 25 Feet" symbol and delivered the following script:…”
Section: Phase II Individual Comprehension Assessment Interviewsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research by Hancock, Rogers, Schroeder, and Fisk (2004) and Brantley and Wogalter (1999) addressed this concern by proposing methods that would elicit additional responses from participants. Hancock, et al proposed a phrase generation method for testing safety symbols in which participants would prepare a list of phrases based on their understanding of the symbol.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%