2014
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0093845
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Oral and Anal Vaccination Confers Full Protection against Enteric Redmouth Disease (ERM) in Rainbow Trout

Abstract: The effect of oral vaccines against bacterial fish diseases has been a topic for debate for decades. Recently both M-like cells and dendritic cells have been discovered in the intestine of rainbow trout. It is therefore likely that antigens reaching the intestine can be taken up and thereby induce immunity in orally vaccinated fish. The objective of this project was to investigate whether oral and anal vaccination of rainbow trout induces protection against an experimental waterborne infection with the pathoge… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Immersion vaccines have been tested with positive results showing protection against a posterior challenge and IgM specific antibodies in serum against the bacteria (Raida et al, 2011). Similarly, oral and anal vaccination against ERM with inactivated Y. ruckeri protects the animal against a subsequent infection with the pathogen (Gravningen et al, 1998; Villumsen et al, 2014). Strikingly, no specific IgM responsewas detected in serum of infected, or survivor fish after the infection, indicating the possibility that protection was not induced by antibodies, or alternatively, that IgT was involved in protective responses, as IgT responses were not measured.…”
Section: Mucosal B Cell Responses In Gutmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Immersion vaccines have been tested with positive results showing protection against a posterior challenge and IgM specific antibodies in serum against the bacteria (Raida et al, 2011). Similarly, oral and anal vaccination against ERM with inactivated Y. ruckeri protects the animal against a subsequent infection with the pathogen (Gravningen et al, 1998; Villumsen et al, 2014). Strikingly, no specific IgM responsewas detected in serum of infected, or survivor fish after the infection, indicating the possibility that protection was not induced by antibodies, or alternatively, that IgT was involved in protective responses, as IgT responses were not measured.…”
Section: Mucosal B Cell Responses In Gutmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence Y. ruckeri can easily spread from one trout population to another and from one farm to another. In order to prevent devastating disease outbreaks and massive antibiotic treatment, appropriate vaccination and good husbandry is essential (Villumsen et al 2014). For vaccination, ERM vaccines are mainly applied by the immersion method, which allows vaccinating large numbers of juveniles in a fast and reliable manner (Chettri et al 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The following antigen delivery systems have been applied for ERM: oral (Ghosh et al, 2016;Jaafar et al, 2017), anal (Villumsen et al, 2014), immersion (Ghosh et al, 2016;Buchmann, 2008) nasal (LaPatra et al, 2015;Salinas et al, 2015), and an interperitoneal injection (Chetri et al, 2013). Immersion is the preferred method of antigen delivery because it allows for massive and quick fish vaccination in the freshwater stage, when the fish are too small to receive an injection (Villumsen et al, 2014). Immersion vaccines decrease the number of Y. ruckeri outbreaks and substantially reduce the use of antibiotics in salmon farming (Chetri et al, 2013).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%