1978
DOI: 10.1126/science.628845
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optokinetic Eye Movements in Albino Rabbits: Inversion in Anterior Visual Field

Abstract: When visual contrasts are restricted to the anterior sector (90 degrees to 180 degrees) of the albino rabbit's visual field, eye position is dramatically unstable, and when such contrasts are moved, horizontal optokinetic eye movements are inverted: the direction of pursuit is opposite to that of the stimulus. In the posterior visual field stability and optokinetic reactions are normal, as in all parts of the pigmented rabbit's visual field. This phenomenon may be one more of the complex of visual system defec… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
28
0

Year Published

1979
1979
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
(10 reference statements)
2
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because mismatch of eye-specific input may induce interocular suppression (Sherman, 1974;Leamey et al, 2007), occluding one eye presumably removes one incompatible source, and therefore suppression, allowing the remaining contralateral input to mediate normal optomotor responses. The result is consistent with studies showing impaired visuomotor behavior in albino mice which have reduced ipsilateral projections (Balkema et al, 1981), and in rabbits when the anterior visual field is masked (Collewijn et al, 1978).…”
Section: Contralateral and Ipsilateral Sc Input Contributes To Visuomsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Because mismatch of eye-specific input may induce interocular suppression (Sherman, 1974;Leamey et al, 2007), occluding one eye presumably removes one incompatible source, and therefore suppression, allowing the remaining contralateral input to mediate normal optomotor responses. The result is consistent with studies showing impaired visuomotor behavior in albino mice which have reduced ipsilateral projections (Balkema et al, 1981), and in rabbits when the anterior visual field is masked (Collewijn et al, 1978).…”
Section: Contralateral and Ipsilateral Sc Input Contributes To Visuomsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Unfortunately, there is no anatomical evidence for a significant ipsilateral projection to the NOT in pigmented rabbits (Klooster et al, 1983). Thus, Collewijn et al (1978) and Winterson and Collewijn (1981) already suggest an alternative explanation: a change in early retinal cell proliferation affecting direction selectivity. This change in retinal cell proliferation and specification could also lead to a loss of direction selectivity in the NOT if it would cause erroneous convergence of retinal ganglion cells with different preferred directions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…There is a slight problem with the inversion model of Collewijn et al (1978). The model assumes that in pigmented rabbits a significant proportion of direction-selective retinal ganglion cells from temporal retina (which are stimulated from anterior visual field and prefer nasotemporal stimulus movement) projects ipsilaterally to the NOT.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since an anomalous optokinetic responsiveness was discovered in albino rabbits [5], the general applicability of albino rabbit data has been questioned. However, reexamination using pigmented rabbits as experimental subjects revealed an essential similarity between the data obtained from these two strains, except for certain quantitative differences [39][40][41].…”
Section: Operation Of the Cerebellar Neuronal Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%