2013
DOI: 10.2478/optog-2013-0001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optogenetics in the behaving rat: integration of diverse new technologies in a vital animal model

Abstract: Rats are the preferred experimental subjects across many fields of neuroscience, for which these large and behaviorally-complex rodents occupy a favorable position that jointly optimizes accessibility for experimental intervention and richness of experimental readout. Yet application of new optogenetic tools in the rat system has been slower than in the mouse system until recently, due in part to technical challenges. These challenges have now largely been overcome, and the neuroscience community is applying o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 207 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While there are a number of methods for inactivating brain regions including physical lesions [1], pharmacological inactivation [2], optogenetics [3] and chemogenetics [4], inactivation by cooling [5] is particularly advantageous for manipulating large areas of tissue that may be intractable when using genetic tools or optical stimulation/suppression [6]. Furthermore unlike physical lesions and slow-release implantable drugs, the effects of cooling are acute and reversible [5], limiting the potential for other brain regions to compensate for the loss of neural function and allowing within-subject comparison of interleaved control and inactivation sessions [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While there are a number of methods for inactivating brain regions including physical lesions [1], pharmacological inactivation [2], optogenetics [3] and chemogenetics [4], inactivation by cooling [5] is particularly advantageous for manipulating large areas of tissue that may be intractable when using genetic tools or optical stimulation/suppression [6]. Furthermore unlike physical lesions and slow-release implantable drugs, the effects of cooling are acute and reversible [5], limiting the potential for other brain regions to compensate for the loss of neural function and allowing within-subject comparison of interleaved control and inactivation sessions [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specification of defined neural pathways for optogenetic perturbation has been achieved in a number of ways (reviewed in Deisseroth, 2014; Packer et al, 2013; Zalocusky and Deisseroth, 2013). One approach (called projection targeting) relies on optogenetic actuator expression in an upstream neuronal population defined by focal virus injection; a subset of these neurons (defined by having efferent connections to a spatially-separated downstream brain area) is then selected by restricting light delivery to excite or inhibit the axons of this neuronal subpopulation in the target brain region (or, more generally, in a location that distinguishes the pathway of interest) in vivo during behavior (Gradinaru et al, 2009; Tye et al, 2011; Stuber et al, 2011).…”
Section: Observing and Controlling Population And Projection Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inhibition of a subset of myelinated neurons using the powerful molecular tools available to control neuronal activity would permit probing their role in normal and neuropathic conditions [2,5,11,35,54,57]. Optically active channels and pumps are one such tool and hold promise for therapeutic application and interrogation of cellular systems [3,8,11,19,29,36].…”
Section: 0 Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%