Optogenetic approaches for functional mouse brain mapping

Abstract

To better understand the connectivity of the brain, it is important to map both structural and functional connections between neurons and cortical regions. In recent years, a set of optogenetic tools have been developed that permit selective manipulation and investigation of neural systems. These tools have enabled the mapping of functional connections between stimulated cortical targets and other brain regions. Advantages of the approach include the ability to arbitrarily stimulate brain regions that express opsins, allowing for brain mapping independent of behavior or sensory processing. The ability of opsins to be rapidly and locally activated allows for investigation of connectivity with spatial resolution on the order of single neurons and temporal resolution on the order of milliseconds. Optogenetic methods for functional mapping have been applied in experiments ranging from in vitro investigation of microcircuits, to in vivo probing of inter-regional cortical connections, to examination of global connections within the whole brain. We review recently developed functional mapping methods that use optogenetic single-point stimulation in the rodent brain and employ cellular electrophysiology, evoked motor movements, voltage sensitive dyes (VSDs), calcium indicators, or functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to assess activity. In particular we highlight results using red-shifted organic VSDs that permit high temporal resolution imaging in a manner spectrally separated from Channelrhodopsin-2 (ChR2) activation. VSD maps stimulated by ChR2 were dependent on intracortical synaptic activity and were able to reflect circuits used for sensory processing. Although the methods reviewed are powerful, challenges remain with respect to finding approaches that permit selective high temporal resolution assessment of stimulated activity in animals that can be followed longitudinally.

Stroke and the Connectome: How Connectivity Guides Therapeutic Intervention

“…These studies will be important for validating possible patient-based activity assessments, but they have obvious limitations: it is only possible to conclude that networks are coactivated, and one cannot directly infer degree of activation, causality, or direction (driver versus follower). Directionality can be inferred using optogenetic intracortical microstimulation (Lim et al, 2013; Figure 2C). With these caveats in mind, assessment of functional connectivity based on spontaneous events still has merits for showing which circuits are still activated and potentially able to aid recovery in the poststroke brain.…”

Interfacing with Neural Activity via Femtosecond Laser Stimulation of Drug-Encapsulating Liposomal Nanostructures

“…A particular strength of optical methods is the ability to interact with neurons with fine spatiotemporal resolution (Callaway and Yuste, 2002; Szobota and Isacoff, 2010; Shepherd, 2012; Lim et al, 2013), but existing methods have some important limitations. Until now, caged compounds and optogenetic methods have been the principal methods of optical manipulation.…”

What Is Optogenetics and How Can We Use It to Discover More About the Brain?

“…Since then, optogenetic methods have been used to study the brain from many different points of view-from the communication of a cluster of individual neurons, to the interactions between large brain regions (reviewed in Ref. [5]). Many other studies have used optogenetic methods to investigate different topics and questions.…”