2017
DOI: 10.1063/1.4990288
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optoelectronic insights into the photovoltaic losses from photocurrent, voltage, and energy perspectives

Abstract: Photocurrent and voltage losses are the fundamental limitations for improving the efficiency of photovoltaic devices. It is indeed that a comprehensive and quantitative differentiation of the performance degradation in solar cells will promote the understanding of photovoltaic physics as well as provide a useful guidance to design highly-efficient and cost-effective solar cells. Based on optoelectronic simulation that addresses electromagnetic and carrier-transport responses in a coupled finite-element method,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
9
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
2
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, to have a complete information on the photocurrent and various current loss mechanisms, the photogenerated current density ( J ph ) (under perfect internal quantum process), short‐circuit current density ( J sc ) (under realistic optoelectronic calculation), current loss due to bulk recombination ( J bulk ), and current loss due to surface recombination ( J surf ) are all examined for both n‐ and p‐perovskite PSCs, as shown in Figure a,b, respectively. In fact, J ph sets the upper limit of the photocurrent since all carrier losses during the transportation have been neglected; therefore, there has the following conservation: Jph=Jsc+Jbulk+Jsurf which has indeed been verified by our simulation.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Moreover, to have a complete information on the photocurrent and various current loss mechanisms, the photogenerated current density ( J ph ) (under perfect internal quantum process), short‐circuit current density ( J sc ) (under realistic optoelectronic calculation), current loss due to bulk recombination ( J bulk ), and current loss due to surface recombination ( J surf ) are all examined for both n‐ and p‐perovskite PSCs, as shown in Figure a,b, respectively. In fact, J ph sets the upper limit of the photocurrent since all carrier losses during the transportation have been neglected; therefore, there has the following conservation: Jph=Jsc+Jbulk+Jsurf which has indeed been verified by our simulation.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 76%
“…7a, the J-V characteristics have been calculated for the initial temperature (T=293 K) and the coupled temperature (ranged between 315-320 K). The current-density is not affected as it is not directly temperature-dependent [19] but the V oc has significantly reduced for about 0.05 V as it is a temperature-dependent parameter (as expected from Eq. ( 13)).…”
Section: Temperature Impact On J-v Characteristicssupporting
confidence: 61%
“…[20] where a raise in temperature from 293K (T in our initial study) to over 320K (T in our coupled study) deterred the cell efficiency from 21.52% to 19.72%. It is also noted that although the short-circuit current density of the cell did not decrease by the heat generation in this cell, the experimental data shows that for temperatures over 320 K, J sc will also experience a slight decrease due to increased J o and from bandgap's dependency on temperature [23]. Note, in our study, the optical reflection loss and parasitic loss from the resistance of the thin layers in this solar cell structure was not calculated as was pointed in Fig.…”
Section: Temperature Impact On J-v Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…12(a), exhibits maximum heating at the CdS and perovskite surfaces due to the highest SRH recombination rate [28]. Additionally, excess energy above the bandgap (ℎ𝜈 − 𝐸 𝑔 ) generates heat through the thermalization process, which is spatially dependent on the generation rate profile [35]. The non-radiative heat distribution for the grated CdS structure is shown in Fig.…”
Section: Effect Of Plasmonic Np Shapementioning
confidence: 99%