2021
DOI: 10.1111/ajt.16502
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

OPTN/SRTR 2019 Annual Data Report: Kidney

Abstract: Despite the ongoing severe shortage of available kidney grafts relative to candidates in need, data from 2019 reveal some promising trends. After remaining relatively stagnant for many years, the number of kidney transplants has increased each year since 2015, reaching the highest annual count to date of 24,273 in 2019. The number of patients waiting for a kidney transplant in the United States was relatively stable, despite an increase in the number of new candidates added in 2019 and a decrease in patients r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

12
333
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 302 publications
(345 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
12
333
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Not surprisingly, kidney transplant rates in the study timeline are far below the rates reported for the general population of patients on the waiting list. 2 The current data do not support indiscriminate access to renal transplantation for these patients but underline that a significant survival advantage still exists: transplantation remains effective in cases considered to be potential candidates, despite major aortic disease. Careful clinical appreciation is nonetheless essential and should be declined according to the type of disease and its potential anatomical consequences (ie, extent of residual aortic dissection after repair of the thoracic segment).…”
mentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Not surprisingly, kidney transplant rates in the study timeline are far below the rates reported for the general population of patients on the waiting list. 2 The current data do not support indiscriminate access to renal transplantation for these patients but underline that a significant survival advantage still exists: transplantation remains effective in cases considered to be potential candidates, despite major aortic disease. Careful clinical appreciation is nonetheless essential and should be declined according to the type of disease and its potential anatomical consequences (ie, extent of residual aortic dissection after repair of the thoracic segment).…”
mentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Other reports have demonstrated more intense immune responsiveness among pediatric recipients, suggesting that the immunological milieu for the allograft may be affected by age [ 36 , 41 , 42 ]. Furthermore, children are prioritized to receive deceased donor kidneys with lower kidney donor profile index (KDPI) scores (<35%), and thus, the quality of the graft may influence gene expression [ 8 ]. Furthermore, the need for sensitive markers of allograft injury may be greater among children given that adult-sized grafts may mask damage that is not accompanied by an increase in serum creatinine [ 41 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet despite significant advancements in short-term outcomes [ 5 , 6 , 7 ], long-term outcomes remain suboptimal. Currently, patient survival is approximately 90% at 10 years post-transplant, but only 50–60% of allografts survive this long [ 7 , 8 , 9 ]. The mismatch between patient and graft longevity presents challenges for both pediatric patients and transplant centers, since repeat transplant not only increases the likelihood of morbidity and mortality for the child but also reduces the supply of donor organs available to other transplant candidates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The number of patients requiring repeat kidney transplants is increasing [1,2]. According to the most recent OPTN/SRTR 2019 Annual Data Report, 16.3% (2009), 14.4% (2014), and 11.8% (2019) of the patients on the waiting list had a history of a previous transplant [3]. Traditionally, these patients are considered to have a high immunological risk for early acute rejection and graft loss [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%