2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.fsc.2010.10.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Options for Internal Lining in Nasal Reconstruction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
32
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
32
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These smaller flaps, as described by Farina and later Millard 10 , were used to reline the vestibule only and are essentially an epithelial turn-in flap. To our knowledge, the present report is the first description of using a two-staged interpolated melolabial flap based off a sizeable subcutaneous fat pedicle to reconstruct large (15 cm 2 in this case) defects of internal nasal lining.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…These smaller flaps, as described by Farina and later Millard 10 , were used to reline the vestibule only and are essentially an epithelial turn-in flap. To our knowledge, the present report is the first description of using a two-staged interpolated melolabial flap based off a sizeable subcutaneous fat pedicle to reconstruct large (15 cm 2 in this case) defects of internal nasal lining.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Skin flaps in hinges are too thick and poorly vascularized for reconstruction of the nasal mucosa; they cause distortion and decreased permeability of the nostril cavity 5 , unlike mu cous flaps, which are thin and well vascularized, and provide ideal blood supply for the cartilaginous graft without any obstructions to nasal air flow 6 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If used for larger defects, it risks elevating the alar rim or distorting the alar contour. 2 Thus, neither approach was appropriate for the authors' patient.…”
Section: Resolutionmentioning
confidence: 94%