2008
DOI: 10.2202/1558-3708.1580
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Option Valuation with Normal Mixture GARCH Models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They find that the HAR models are better than the NGARCH model in predicting out-of-sample option prices probably because the former are based on realized volatility which is closer to the implied volatility of options. Badescu, Kulperger, and Lazar (2008) find that an asymmetric normal mixture GARCH model is better at predicting out-of-sample prices of S&P 500 call options than the standard NGARCH (1,1) option pricing model. Although researchers such as Singh, Ahmed and Pachori (2011) have studied the empirical performance of different models for pricing index options in India to the best of our knowledge there has been no study till date in respect of options on the rupee-dollar currency pair.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…They find that the HAR models are better than the NGARCH model in predicting out-of-sample option prices probably because the former are based on realized volatility which is closer to the implied volatility of options. Badescu, Kulperger, and Lazar (2008) find that an asymmetric normal mixture GARCH model is better at predicting out-of-sample prices of S&P 500 call options than the standard NGARCH (1,1) option pricing model. Although researchers such as Singh, Ahmed and Pachori (2011) have studied the empirical performance of different models for pricing index options in India to the best of our knowledge there has been no study till date in respect of options on the rupee-dollar currency pair.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…In fact, volatility is the only parameter that needs to be estimated and we could argue that in option markets, investors trade volatility. Second, volatility measurement is an important issue for policy makers, portfolio managers and financial market participants because it can be used as a measurement of risk, providing an important input for portfolio management, option pricing and market regulation (Poon and Granger, 2003;Badescu et al, 2008). Third, a related issue, which has become very clear during the 2007-2009 financial crisis, is that greater volatility in the financial markets raises important questions about the stability of the global financial system and its consequences on the real economy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stock-level leverage effects are not incompatible with our previous findings: once diversified away through index investing, leverage effects would therefore disappear, explaining the previously listed empirical results. Using the components of the SP500 index, we run the in-sample Hansen test and measure the percentage of stocks for which we find a statistically significant leverage effect 6 .…”
Section: Testing For Leverage Effects At a Stock Levelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The time varying volatility structure accounts for the potential changes in the level of risk in financial markets when the conditional distribution deals with the rare occurrence of extreme events, usually seen as jumps. Such an approach turned out to be both successful when applied in continuous -as in Bates (1996)'s extension of Heston (1993)'s work -and in discrete time models -as in Christoffersen et al (2006Christoffersen et al ( , 2010, Badescu et al (2008), Chorro et al (2010Chorro et al ( , 2012 or Guégan et al (2013). The estimation of such models is a complex matter as components in the volatility structure and in the conditional distribution can impact the model implied density in a very similar way.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation