2007
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.946787
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Option Backdating and Board Interlocks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

15
119
3

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 121 publications
(137 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
(47 reference statements)
15
119
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Sah (1991) points out that exposure to the dishonesty of others could lead managers to change their subjective estimate of manipulation costs and benefits. There is evidence that having board members who are interlocked to a backdating company increases the chance that the firm also backdates employee stock options (Bizjak et al 2009). Fich and Shivdasani (2007) find that firms are more likely to face a financial lawsuit if they have a board member who sits on the board of another firm that has previously been sued for fraud.…”
Section: Prior Research and Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Sah (1991) points out that exposure to the dishonesty of others could lead managers to change their subjective estimate of manipulation costs and benefits. There is evidence that having board members who are interlocked to a backdating company increases the chance that the firm also backdates employee stock options (Bizjak et al 2009). Fich and Shivdasani (2007) find that firms are more likely to face a financial lawsuit if they have a board member who sits on the board of another firm that has previously been sued for fraud.…”
Section: Prior Research and Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the empirical side, recent research has documented that several types of corporate behaviors such as compensation practices, poison pill adoption, and stock exchange listing decisions spread through networks of interlocking boards (see Teoh 2003, 2009;Bizjak et al 2009;Rao et al 2000;Davis 1991etc. ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bebchuk, Grinstein, and Peyer (2006) show that CEOs are more likely to get grants at monthly lows when the board does not have a majority of independent directors. Bizjak, Lemmon, and Whitby (2006) report that executives are more likely to receive opportunistically timed grants when the firm's directors serve on the board of another company that was earlier involved in opportunistic timing of executive grants. 9 See Byrd and Hickman (1992), Shivdasani (1993), Brickley, Coles, and Terry (1994), Cotter, Shivdasani, andZenner (1997), Dann, Del Guercio, andPartch (2003), Gillette, Noe, and Rebello (2003), Weisbach (1987), Core, Holthausen, and Larcker (1999), Chhaochharia and Grinstein (2006b), Beasely (1996, and Dechow, Sloan and Sweeny (1996).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, researchers could also find that director embeddedness leads to the formation of an economic elite (Allen 1974) that might not act in the interest of the firm anymore but rather optimizes its own interests. Through their embeddedness, directors learn to overcome their inhibitions for criminal behavior such as the backdating of options in executive compensation schemes (Bizjak et al 2009). Generally, the effect of director embeddedness on firm level outcomes is still unclear.…”
Section: Literature Overview Theoretical Background and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%