2009 IEEE 20th International Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications 2009
DOI: 10.1109/pimrc.2009.5450000
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimum transmit filter for Single-Carrier FDMA with Frequency-Domain Linear Equalization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Compared with non-adaptive OFDM, SC-FDE has significantly lower PAPR and bit error rate (BER) [15]. However, the achievable rate of SC-FDE is dominated by the worst frequency subchannel gain, while SC-FDE with channel-adaptive power control provides higher throughput but at the cost of increased PAPR [16]. Moreover, generalized frequency division multiplexing (GFDM) was recently proposed [17], which includes OFDM and SC-FDE as two special cases.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with non-adaptive OFDM, SC-FDE has significantly lower PAPR and bit error rate (BER) [15]. However, the achievable rate of SC-FDE is dominated by the worst frequency subchannel gain, while SC-FDE with channel-adaptive power control provides higher throughput but at the cost of increased PAPR [16]. Moreover, generalized frequency division multiplexing (GFDM) was recently proposed [17], which includes OFDM and SC-FDE as two special cases.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, when a suboptimal receiver is used, such as the ZF or MMSE frequency-domain linear equalizer, the waterfilling spectrum must be suitably modified [8]. In [9], we have shown that the transmit power allocation scheme in [8], initially proposed for SC-FDE, can be extended to SC-FDMA, in order to exploit the sub-channelization gain in SC-FDMA. As a result, the system can generate multi-user diversity through channel dependent scheduling, or generate a frequency diversity gain through frequency hopping.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%