2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2010.08.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimum strain gage location for evaluating stress intensity factors in single and double ended cracked configurations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…( 21). The r DS 1,max can also be determined by the methodology proposed by Sarangi et al [35][36][37] for determining the extent of validity of the three-term solution (Eq. ( 21)).…”
Section: Case Of a Single Gagementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…( 21). The r DS 1,max can also be determined by the methodology proposed by Sarangi et al [35][36][37] for determining the extent of validity of the three-term solution (Eq. ( 21)).…”
Section: Case Of a Single Gagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…(36). Following the methodology proposed by Sarangi et al [35][36][37] for determining r P T 1,max , Eq. ( 36) can be written as…”
Section: Case Of a Single Rectangular Rosettementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To avoid the effects of the strain gradient, threedimensionality and plasticity, the strain location was chosen relatively far from the crack front (Sarangi et al, 2013). The optimum radial location of the strain gage, r, was found using the approach proposed by Sarangi et al (2010Sarangi et al ( , 2013. Gage length of 1 mm was employed to eliminate the strain measure error (Berger and Dally, 1988;Younis and Kang, 2011).…”
Section: Equipmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the study of fracture mechanics by Sarangi et al 2 in strain gauge techniques, they found that the gauges should be placed at appropriate locations and orientations with respect to the crack tip, and at high strain gradient areas; however, they should not be placed on too large strain gradient areas so as to avoid averaging errors caused by plasticity and three-dimensional (3D) effects. In automated production systems, it is vital to obtain reliable machining signals since the tool wear has great direct effects on quality of the machined parts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%