1991
DOI: 10.2307/2532157
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimum Size of Sampling Unit for Estimating the Density of Marine Populations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0
1

Year Published

1996
1996
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
19
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Defining the sampling frame is a critical issue in a fishery-independent survey. For example, the size of sampling unit can influence the performance of certain sampling designs (Pennington and Volstad 1991). In this study the sampling unit was defined as 1NM × 1NM and some potential sampling units were excluded due to the operability of gear type.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Defining the sampling frame is a critical issue in a fishery-independent survey. For example, the size of sampling unit can influence the performance of certain sampling designs (Pennington and Volstad 1991). In this study the sampling unit was defined as 1NM × 1NM and some potential sampling units were excluded due to the operability of gear type.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A logarithmic rather than a linear scale is used, because for marine catch data the variance is often proportional to the square of the mean (Pennington 1983;Pennington and Vølstad 1991) and a logarithmic transformation will consequently stabilize the variance (Snedecor and Cochran 1980). The experimental design was roughly balanced (Table 1) and the model (eq.…”
Section: Data Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Third, there is a feeling that only using daytime measurements is tantamount to throwing away valuable information and not exploiting the measurements in an adequate way. Survey vessel time is expensive and optimal use of available resources is crucial for the quality of the survey results (Pennington and Vølstad 1991).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%