2017
DOI: 10.1049/iet-bmt.2016.0060
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimum scheme selection for face–iris biometric

Abstract: Designing a new dynamic and optimal scheme for face-iris fusion based on the score level, feature level and decision level fusion is considered in this study. Prior to implementing the proposed combined level fusion, several schemes are separately implemented at each level of fusion to investigate the performance improvement of each level of fusion on face and iris modalities. In fact, the optimum scheme is constructed by selecting flexible and dynamic features and scores of face and iris biometrics and then c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, we can conclude this work as a robust face-ocular multimodal biometric system to predict the gender of individuals by reducing the average of search time in multimodal biometric systems. Table 5 Comparison of proposed method with State-of-theart fusion techniques on CASIA-Iris-Distance dataset Fusion techniques Prediction rate Score level fusion min rule [28] 83.00 ± 0.39 max rule [28] 83.00 ± 0.90 weighted sum rule [13] 85.00 ± 0.50 product rule [25] 85.00 ± 0.74 Feature level fusion multiple kernel learning [39] 86.00 ± 0.64 Decision level fusion AND rule [33] 83.00 ± 0.81 majority voting (MV) [40] 83.00 ± 0.73 OR rule [33] 84.00 ± 0.52 threshold optimised AND rule [41] 85.00 ± 0.57 threshold optimised OR rule [41] 86.00 ± 0.66 Proposed scheme 88.00 ± 0.94…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Finally, we can conclude this work as a robust face-ocular multimodal biometric system to predict the gender of individuals by reducing the average of search time in multimodal biometric systems. Table 5 Comparison of proposed method with State-of-theart fusion techniques on CASIA-Iris-Distance dataset Fusion techniques Prediction rate Score level fusion min rule [28] 83.00 ± 0.39 max rule [28] 83.00 ± 0.90 weighted sum rule [13] 85.00 ± 0.50 product rule [25] 85.00 ± 0.74 Feature level fusion multiple kernel learning [39] 86.00 ± 0.64 Decision level fusion AND rule [33] 83.00 ± 0.81 majority voting (MV) [40] 83.00 ± 0.73 OR rule [33] 84.00 ± 0.52 threshold optimised AND rule [41] 85.00 ± 0.57 threshold optimised OR rule [41] 86.00 ± 0.66 Proposed scheme 88.00 ± 0.94…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fusion of information for this kind of system is done at four different levels such as sensor level, match score level, feature level, and decision level fusion [24]. This study takes into account the consideration of match score level and feature level fusion to predicate gender of individuals due to the ease in accessing, fusing and providing high recognition performance [25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33]. Match score level fusion considers three different categories to fuse the scores, namely transformation-based score fusion, classifier-based score fusion, and density-based score fusion.…”
Section: Multimodal Biometric Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A GAR of 98.03% and TER of 0.27% is reported trough the experimental result based on the proposed study. An optimum scheme selection for face and iris biometric was proposed by Eskandari and Sharifi [29] in 2016; in this study, they investigate the performance of various combination rules (feature level, score level and decision level) on face and iris modality. In this study threshold optimizes decision is utilized to combine the face and iris biometrics optimal decision.…”
Section: International Journal Of Innovative Technology and Exploringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, the use of biometric recognition systems in term of identification and/or verification of individuals according to their physical or behavioral characteristics is extensively studied in situations with high security demands [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10]. In fact, the ability of biometrics to improve recognition performance and security of applications considered as increasing interest of researchers compared to conventional techniques such as token-based and knowledge-based methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%