2010
DOI: 10.5338/kjea.2010.29.2.197
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimum Recovery of Biogas from Pig Slurry with Different Compositions

Abstract: This study was conducted to investigate the optimum conditions for efficient methane production through anaerobic digestion of pig waste slurry. The examined parameters were organic matter content of the pig slurry, the ratio of seed sludge to pig slurry, and stirring intensity of the digestion reactor. The effects of types of slurry produced from different purpose-based pigs fed with different feeds were also tested. The methane concentration in the produced biogas was 45% when the ratio of seed sludge to pig… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
1
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Swine manure (TS: 3.84% and VS: 2.36%) was processed with a CSTR (Kim et al, 2001), and the stirring speed was 90 rpm, which is the optimal stirring speed for 3% solid content (Park et al, 2010). At this speed, 120 min of stirring was conducted in a day, and four different stirring intervals (5 min/h, 10 min/2 h, 15 min/3 h, and 20 min/4 h) were used.…”
Section: Swine Manurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Swine manure (TS: 3.84% and VS: 2.36%) was processed with a CSTR (Kim et al, 2001), and the stirring speed was 90 rpm, which is the optimal stirring speed for 3% solid content (Park et al, 2010). At this speed, 120 min of stirring was conducted in a day, and four different stirring intervals (5 min/h, 10 min/2 h, 15 min/3 h, and 20 min/4 h) were used.…”
Section: Swine Manurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…์Šฌ๋Ÿฌ๋ฆฌํ˜• ๋ˆ์‚ฌ๋Š” ์–‘๋ˆ๋†๊ฐ€์—์„œ ์‚ฌ์œก๊ฒฝ์˜์ƒ ์œ ์ง€๊ด€ ๋ฆฌ๊ฐ€ ์šฉ์ดํ•˜์—ฌ ์„ ํ˜ธํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ์œผ๋‚˜, ์œ ๊ธฐ์„ฑ ํ๊ธฐ๋ฌผ์˜ ํ•ด์–‘ํˆฌ๊ธฐ ๊ธˆ์ง€ ๋“ฑ์— ์˜ํ•˜์—ฌ ๋ˆ๋ถ„์Šฌ๋Ÿฌ๋ฆฌ์˜ ์ฒ˜๋ฆฌ๊ฐ€ ํฐ ๋ฌธ์ œ๋กœ ๋Œ€๋‘๋˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์Šฌ๋Ÿฌ๋ฆฌ ํ˜•ํƒœ์˜ ๋ˆ๋ถ„๋‡จ๋Š” ์ผ๋ฐ˜์ ์œผ๋กœ ์œ ๊ธฐ๋ฌผ ํ•จ๋Ÿ‰์ด ๋†’ ๊ณ , ์ˆ˜๋ถ„ํ•จ๋Ÿ‰ ๋ฐ ์ƒ๋ถ„ํ•ด์œจ์ด ๋†’์•„ ํ˜๊ธฐ์„ฑ ์ฒ˜๋ฆฌ์— ์ ํ•ฉํ•œ ์กฐ๊ฑด ์„ ๊ฐ€์ง€๊ณ  ์žˆ์–ด ์œ ๊ธฐ๋ฌผ ๊ฐ๋Ÿ‰์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ์ฒ˜๋ฆฌ๋น„์šฉ ์ ˆ๊ฐ, ํ์ž์›์˜ ๋Œ€์ฒด์—๋„ˆ์ง€ ์ด์šฉ, ๋†๊ฒฝ์ง€์˜ ์•ก๋น„ ํ™œ์šฉ์‹œ ์•…์ทจ ์ €๊ฐ, ์„ธ๊ท ์„ฑ ๋ฏธ์ƒ๋ฌผ ๊ฐ์†Œ ์ธก๋ฉด์—์„œ ํ˜๊ธฐ์„ฑ ์†Œํ™”๊ธฐ์ˆ ์„ ์ด์šฉํ•œ ๋ˆ๋ถ„์Šฌ๋Ÿฌ๋ฆฌ ์ฒ˜๋ฆฌ๊ฐ€ ์ ์ ˆํ•œ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์œผ๋กœ ๋ณด๊ณ ๋˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค(Park et al, 2010).…”
unclassified
“…์ €์žฅ๊ธฐ๊ฐ„์ด ๊ธธ์–ด์ง€๋ฉด ์ €์žฅ๊ธฐ๊ฐ„ ์ค‘์— ๊ฐ€์ˆ˜๋ถ„ํ•ด๊ฐ€ ์ง„ํ–‰๋˜์–ด ์ƒ๋ฌผํ•™์  ์ด์šฉ ๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•œ ์œ ๊ธฐ๋ฌผ์ด ๊ฐ์†Œํ•˜๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์— ๋ˆ์‚ฌ์˜ ๊ตฌ์กฐ ๋ฐ ๋ผ์ง€ ์‚ฌ์œกํ˜•ํƒœ, ๊ณ„์ ˆ ๋“ฑ ๋ˆ๋ถ„์Šฌ๋Ÿฌ๋ฆฌ ์„ฑ์ƒ๊ณผ ํŠน์„ฑ์„ ๊ณ ๋ คํ•œ ์šด์ „์ด ์ด๋ฃจ์–ด์ ธ์•ผ ์†Œํ™”ํšจ์œจ์ด ์ฆ๋Œ€๋˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์œผ ๋กœ ์•Œ๋ ค์ ธ ์žˆ๋‹ค(Park et al, 2010).๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ๋Š” ๋ˆ๋ถ„ ์Šฌ๋Ÿฌ๋ฆฌ์˜ ์ €์žฅ ํŠน์„ฑ์ด ํ˜๊ธฐ์†Œ ํ™” ํšจ์œจ์— ๋ฏธ์น˜๋Š” ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๊ด€์ฐฐํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ๋ˆ๋ถ„ ์Šฌ๋Ÿฌ๋ฆฌ์˜ ์ €์žฅ ํ˜•ํƒœ, ๊ณ„์ ˆ๋ณ„ ์„ฑ์ƒ๋ณ€ํ™” ๋ฐ ์ €์žฅ์˜จ๋„ ๋“ฑ์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ๊ฐ€์šฉํ™” ํŠน์„ฑ ๋ฐ ์œ ๊ธฐ๋ฌผ์˜ ๊ฑฐ๋™์„ ๋ถ„์„ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค.๋„์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ์„ฑ์ƒ๋ณ€ํ™”๋ฅผ ๋ฐฉ์ง€ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ๊ฒฝ๊ธฐ๋„ R ์ถ•์‚ฐ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์†Œ(Fig. 1)์—์„œ ์ฑ„์ทจํ•˜์˜€๊ณ , ๋ˆ๋ถ„ ์Šฌ๋Ÿฌ๋ฆฌ ๋‚ด ํ˜‘์žก๋ฌผ ๋ฐ ๋ชจ๋ž˜ ๋“ฑ ์„ ์ œ๊ฑฐํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด 2 mm ์ฒด(sieve)๋กœ ๊ฑฐ๋ฅธ ํ›„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค.…”
unclassified