2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2019.01.139
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimum ratio of hydrophobic to hydrophilic areas of biphilic surfaces in thermal fluid systems involving boiling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

2
28
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 110 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
2
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a result, the authors reported that the three-phase contact line was more likely to be dislodged from the edge of the hydrophobic spot under sufficiently low-pressure conditions, where particularly quick bubble growth tended to prevail. An investigation to find a novel and facile process flow for the fabrication of biphilic surfaces was proposed and tested by Reference [ 31 ]. The researchers studied ten biphilic surfaces with hydrophilic/total areas ranging from 0.19% to 95% and they tested them, to analyze the effect of heterogeneous wettability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, the authors reported that the three-phase contact line was more likely to be dislodged from the edge of the hydrophobic spot under sufficiently low-pressure conditions, where particularly quick bubble growth tended to prevail. An investigation to find a novel and facile process flow for the fabrication of biphilic surfaces was proposed and tested by Reference [ 31 ]. The researchers studied ten biphilic surfaces with hydrophilic/total areas ranging from 0.19% to 95% and they tested them, to analyze the effect of heterogeneous wettability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, (Sadaghiani et al, 2020a;Sadaghiani et al, 2020b) studied the effect of artificial cavities on three phase contact line and reported an optimum ratio of diameter to pitch distance, which maximized the heat transfer coefficient in pool boiling. Similarly, it was reported that biphilic surfaces resulted in enhancements of pool boiling heat transfer (Motezakker et al, 2019) and flow boiling heat transfer . According to Honda and Wei (Honda et al, 2002), micro structures such as micro-roughness and micro-porous coatings significantly facilitated the incipience of boiling, while delaying the CHF (critical heat flux).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Experimental studies proved that hydrophobic substrates provide higher heat transfer coefficients in flow boiling in micro- (Choi et al, 2011;Kim and Lee, 2019) and minichannels (Phan et al, 2011;Zhao et al, 2021) in comparison with hydrophilic ones. Generally, low energy surfaces (hydrophobic) remarkably augment the onset of nucleate boiling and bubble departure, while high energy surfaces (hydrophilic) enhance liquid replenishment and raises the critical heat flux (Motezakker et al, 2019;Sadaghiani et al, 2020a;Tan et al, 2021). Therefore, recent studies suggest that surface modification is an effective method to improve heat transfer via phase-change heat transfer including droplet evaporation (Dai et al, 2014;Aboubakri et al, 2020), flow condensation (Chehrghani et al, 2021), flow and pool boiling (Shojaeian and Koşar, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many surface modification techniques [5], [6] have been proposed and investigated to achieve these goals. These techniques include implementation of nanowire arrays [7], nanorods [8], graphene coating [9], polymer coating [10], [11], virus coating [12], biphilic surfaces [13], porous surfaces [14], laser-engineered surfaces [15], and plasma spray coating [16]. Based on the application and the range of the applied heat fluxes, these three aspects should be considered in the design of thermal-fluids systems to maximize the heat removal from the surface in nucleate boiling and film boiling regimes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%