1979
DOI: 10.1109/tassp.1979.1163269
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimum estimation of time delay by a generalized correlator

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0

Year Published

1983
1983
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 119 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…0 n g, 2 = =f P N ;1 n=0 q 1 (n)e ;j! 0 n g, 3 = <f P N ;1 n=0 q 2 (n)e ;j! 0 n g and 4 = =f P N ;1 n=0 q 2 (n)e ;j!…”
Section: The Proposed Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…0 n g, 2 = =f P N ;1 n=0 q 1 (n)e ;j! 0 n g, 3 = <f P N ;1 n=0 q 2 (n)e ;j! 0 n g and 4 = =f P N ;1 n=0 q 2 (n)e ;j!…”
Section: The Proposed Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This GFDC differs from the generalized cross correlator (GCC) that has been used for radar and sonar signal processing for delay estimation [15,16]. The GCC is closely related to the coherence, a complex quantity that is the cross-power spectral density between two random processes divided by the product of their auto power spectral densities.…”
Section: Generalized Frequency-domain Correlator (Gfdc)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…GCC requires knowledge of the signal and noise spectra. Some of the commonly used prefilters include the Roth processor, the smoothed coherent transform, the phase transform, the Eckart filter, the Hannan-Thomson processor, the Hassab-Boucher processor and the Wiener processor [11][12][13]. The prefilters, in general, enhance the frequency bands where the signal is dominant and attenuate the frequency bands where noise is dominant [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%