2017
DOI: 10.1007/s00170-017-1428-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimum design of vibratory electrode in micro-EDM process

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Graphite gave the least performance in terms of surface integrity parameters. Sajjad Beigmoradi et al [27] conducted a comparison between different tool electrodes' materials and shapes. They found that the tungsten triangular-shaped electrode improved the flushing conditions as compared to circular graphite and the circular tungsten electrode.…”
Section: Literature Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Graphite gave the least performance in terms of surface integrity parameters. Sajjad Beigmoradi et al [27] conducted a comparison between different tool electrodes' materials and shapes. They found that the tungsten triangular-shaped electrode improved the flushing conditions as compared to circular graphite and the circular tungsten electrode.…”
Section: Literature Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gadeschi et al 8 computed the heat flow from the electrode to the dielectric during a EDM using numerical simulation and experimentation. Beigmoradi et al 9 studied different types of tool geometry and materials which can be used as a vibratory tool in the EDM process. The vortex generation and the tool shape can enhance the debris flushing in the gap.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Applying vibration is a known technique to improve the efficiency of the process in a wide range of unconventional machining such as magnetic abrasive finishing (MAF), ultrasonic, electro discharge machining (EDM) and so on. In different machining methods depending on the process, the vibration is imposed on the tool, workpiece or both (Brehl and Dow, 2008; Kumar et al , 2014; Lee et al , 2015; Radhakrishnan and Vijayaraghavan, 2017; Yang et al , 2020; Xu and Zhang, 2015; Maity and Choubey, 2016; Beigmoradi et al , 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%