2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2008.04.030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimum compactness structures derived from the regular octahedron

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As shown in Figure 7, the change in N with increasing p becomes smaller as the number of faces of polyhedra increases from the {100} cube with 6 to the {100}-{111}-{110} polyhedron with 26. Among the various polyhedra shown in Figure 3 ≈ 5.05 has the minimum total surface area S for the same V [8,10]. The a and b dependence of N can be calculated easily using the results shown in the appendix.…”
Section: Shape Transitions Of Superspheres From a Sphere To Various Pmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…As shown in Figure 7, the change in N with increasing p becomes smaller as the number of faces of polyhedra increases from the {100} cube with 6 to the {100}-{111}-{110} polyhedron with 26. Among the various polyhedra shown in Figure 3 ≈ 5.05 has the minimum total surface area S for the same V [8,10]. The a and b dependence of N can be calculated easily using the results shown in the appendix.…”
Section: Shape Transitions Of Superspheres From a Sphere To Various Pmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Compactness measures can be defined typically as functions of volume and surface area. The most common compactness measures are a function of the compactness quotient, indicated by the S/V ratio, S: area of building envelope surface, V: volume of the building (Suárez et al 2008).…”
Section: Comparative Study According To the Level-compactnessmentioning
confidence: 99%