1979
DOI: 10.1021/i260070a005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimum Behavior of a Third-Order Process under Feedback Control

Abstract: sorption, this VCM level during drying may become much lower as the degree of steam superheat during regeneration increases. ConclusionsBased on this work, the following processing scheme is recommended. The carbon should have some residual

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
6
0

Year Published

1979
1979
1988
1988

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
2
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For equal time constants and a small delay (L/Tx = 0.1), the value of TRopt for step load changes is 1.7P" or 2.2PU, depending on the location of the disturbance, compared to 0.8PU when there is only one time constant. These high values of TR/PU are similar to those recommended for processes with two large and one small time constant (Hazebrock and van der Waerden, 1950, Harriott, 1964, Weber and Bhalodia, 1979), since the frequency response near the critical frequency is quite similar when the delay or the third time constant is much smaller than the other lags. Using half the maximum gain for these systems does not give much phase Table I.…”
supporting
confidence: 82%
“…For equal time constants and a small delay (L/Tx = 0.1), the value of TRopt for step load changes is 1.7P" or 2.2PU, depending on the location of the disturbance, compared to 0.8PU when there is only one time constant. These high values of TR/PU are similar to those recommended for processes with two large and one small time constant (Hazebrock and van der Waerden, 1950, Harriott, 1964, Weber and Bhalodia, 1979), since the frequency response near the critical frequency is quite similar when the delay or the third time constant is much smaller than the other lags. Using half the maximum gain for these systems does not give much phase Table I.…”
supporting
confidence: 82%
“…Furthermore, in the format of Figure 4, one is not constrained to the standard CCM parameters. As pointed out in the previous paper of Weber and Bhalodia (1979), ß values between 0.1 and 0.6 are often better than the value of 1.2. Having chosen a value for ß, one can then use Figure 4 to determine the stable region boundary and, hence, an appropriate value of cx through the use of a gain margin such as 1.7.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Feasible Regions and Unstable Regions of the -Plane In the earlier paper of Weber and Bhalodia (1979), a third-order process was characterized in terms of parameters that are related to the CCM tuning method and to a Bode diagram. The maximum gain Kmax is the reciprocal of the normalized amplitude ratio of a Bode diagram at the frequency where the phase lag is 180°.…”
Section: Development Of the Model And Stability Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The integral square of the error (ISE) was chosen as the performance index because it is easily calculated. Furthermore, this function has been used in optimization studies of single loops by Jackson (1958) and Weber and Bhalodia (1979). Therefore, the behavior of the two-loop model here can be related to comparable single loops.…”
Section: Selection Of the Process Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%