2007 IEEE International Conference on Communications 2007
DOI: 10.1109/icc.2007.965
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimizing Zero-Forcing Based Gain Allocation for Wireless Multiuser Networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The additional 4(2) orders of diversity come from the intra cluster gain allocations. This is consistent with the results of [5] presenting that maxmin rate gain allocation maximizes the diversity in MUZFR applications. It is noticable that for 4 clusters with 3 relays, the system offers only 4th order of phase diversity, but no intra cluster diversity.…”
Section: Simulation Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The additional 4(2) orders of diversity come from the intra cluster gain allocations. This is consistent with the results of [5] presenting that maxmin rate gain allocation maximizes the diversity in MUZFR applications. It is noticable that for 4 clusters with 3 relays, the system offers only 4th order of phase diversity, but no intra cluster diversity.…”
Section: Simulation Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Fig. 5 presents a comparison between the proposed C-MUR, MUZFR [5] and relaying with only local CSI (RLCSI) at the relays [4]. Both C-MUR and MUZFR use maxmin rate gain allocations.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For K-user 2-hop networks with L relays, it was shown in [9] that interference can be completely neutralized if K ≥ N (N − 1) + 1, which indicates that for 2 × L × 2 networks interference neutralization can be achieved without channel pairing if L ≥ 3. However, maximizing the achievable sum rate exploiting interference neutralization without channel pairing presented in [32] is non-convex and, as a result, it is unclear how to determine the sum rate gap from the cut-set upper bound. By contrast, we now show that our achievable rate expression from Theorem 1 permits to derive a finite-gap result.…”
Section: B Approximate Capacity As L → ∞mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Assuming that the CSI of both the source-relay and relay-destination channels is known to the relays, then, signal detection and transmission at the relays can be represented by one joint optimization problem, which is referred to as the joint detection/transmission relay optimization. This joint relay optimization problem may be solved in the principles of, such as, MMSE [2][3][4] or ZF [5]. However, this joint detection/transmission relay optimization problem is usually hard to solve.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%