2023
DOI: 10.1088/2631-8695/acfdf3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimizing turning parameters for improved surface quality and productivity of Al-MMC under dry, wet, and MQL conditions

Umesh Khandey,
Vaibhav Chandra,
Vedpal Arya
et al.

Abstract: The machining of Aluminum-based Metal Matrix Composites (Al-MMCs) is challenging due to their inhomogeneity, anisotropic nature, and dynamic cutting forces. In this paper, the effect of machining parameters, including cutting speed, feed rate, and depth of cut, on surface quality (Ra) and main (Normal) cutting forces (Fc) during turning of Al-MMCs under different cutting conditions (DRY, WET, and MQL) was investigated. Statistical analysis tools were used to analyze the experimental results, and ANOVA and RSM … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 27 publications
(28 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the basis of the microscopic flank wear investigations, tool wear analysis was conducted. Umesh et al [14] studied the effect of process parameters on surface finish and cutting forces in single point turning operation of Al-MMCs under dry, wet and minimum quantity lubrication conditions. They used analysis of variance and response surface method (RSM) techniques on the experimental responses for analysis and modeling.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the basis of the microscopic flank wear investigations, tool wear analysis was conducted. Umesh et al [14] studied the effect of process parameters on surface finish and cutting forces in single point turning operation of Al-MMCs under dry, wet and minimum quantity lubrication conditions. They used analysis of variance and response surface method (RSM) techniques on the experimental responses for analysis and modeling.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%