2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.12.070
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimizing the performance of small-scale organic Rankine cycle that utilizes a single-screw expander

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
14
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
2
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This finding is aligned with other studies in the literature which report that for a given size screw expander (i.e. given design VR and volume flow rate), the efficiency is mostly affected by variations in the VR of the device [21]. To predict the piston expander performance at off-design operation, the performance maps generated using an inhouse model have been used, as discussed in Section 2.3.…”
Section: Nominal Expander Design and Sizingsupporting
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This finding is aligned with other studies in the literature which report that for a given size screw expander (i.e. given design VR and volume flow rate), the efficiency is mostly affected by variations in the VR of the device [21]. To predict the piston expander performance at off-design operation, the performance maps generated using an inhouse model have been used, as discussed in Section 2.3.…”
Section: Nominal Expander Design and Sizingsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…[19,20] investigated the performance of ORC engines with scroll expanders and plate/helical coil heat exchangers. Single-stage single screw expanders in off-design operation were also considered by Ziviani et al [21] for smallscale, low-temperature ORC systems, with particular focus on the control strategy of the expander to maximise power output or efficiency. In Ref.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…System optimization, working fluid selection, and heat transfer enhancement are essential for an ORC system. Hence, various simulation and experimental studies about ORC system design, [8][9][10] optimization of system components, [11][12][13] performance of different expanders, [14][15][16] self-adaptive regulation, [17][18][19] and analysis of actual system operation [20][21][22] are proposed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ziviani et al established a nonsymmetric modeling approach to design a single‐screw expander, and the performance was improved significantly. Ziviani et al and Zhang et al adopted a single‐screw expander to build an organic Rankine cycle (ORC) system to recover low‐grade waste heat, and the maximum power outputs of these systems are 11 kW and 10.38 kW, respectively. Wang et al explored the gap sizes between the gate rotor and shell and between the screw and shell.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%