2018
DOI: 10.1002/ecy.2469
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimizing the choice of a spatial weighting matrix in eigenvector‐based methods

Abstract: Eigenvector-mapping methods such as Moran's eigenvector maps (MEM) are derived from a spatial weighting matrix (SWM) that describes the relations among a set of sampled sites. The specification of the SWM is a crucial step, but the SWM is generally chosen arbitrarily, regardless of the sampling design characteristics. Here, we compare the statistical performances of different types of SWMs (distance-based or graph-based) in contrasted realistic simulation scenarios. Then, we present an optimization method and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
87
0
4

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 129 publications
(110 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
87
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…select" function from the R package "adespatial" . Specifically, we used the minimisation of Moran's I in the residuals (MIRs) approach (Bauman et al 2018) to identify the set of MEMs removing spatial autocorrelation in the residuals so that the Moran's I statistic was not significant at a threshold α = 0.1. Any environmental predictor acting as a cross-over suppressor in presence of retained spatial predictors was discarded (see below for details about statistical suppression) and the MIR optimisation procedure was repeated.…”
Section: Investigating the Impact Of Environmental Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…select" function from the R package "adespatial" . Specifically, we used the minimisation of Moran's I in the residuals (MIRs) approach (Bauman et al 2018) to identify the set of MEMs removing spatial autocorrelation in the residuals so that the Moran's I statistic was not significant at a threshold α = 0.1. Any environmental predictor acting as a cross-over suppressor in presence of retained spatial predictors was discarded (see below for details about statistical suppression) and the MIR optimisation procedure was repeated.…”
Section: Investigating the Impact Of Environmental Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The MSR uses information on the spatial connectivity among sampling points obtained when selecting Moran's Eigenvector Maps (MEMs; Dray, Legendre, & Peres‐Neto, 2006) which are commonly used to model multiscale spatial structures in ecological data. Connections among plots were defined using a Gabriel's graph which has been shown appropriate in the case of highly irregular sampling design (Bauman, Drouet, Fortin, & Dray, 2018a). The selection of MEMs was optimised following a forward selection procedure (Blanchet, Legendre, & Borcard, 2008) that has been shown to provide correct type I error rate for the selection of spatial eigenvectors (Bauman, Drouet, Dray, & Vleminckx, 2018b).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Matrix B was generated using three graph-based connection schemes (Gabriel = gab, relative neighbourhood = rel and minimum spanning tree = mst). Weighting matrices A were derived from three functions: f bin = binary, based only on topology and reflecting a neutrality in the weight; f lin = 1-(d/dmax), linear, and f con = 1-(d/dmax) 0.5 , nonlinear, both weighted by the inverse of the power of Euclidean distances (d and dmax) between two sampling sites (BAUMAN et al, 2018). The selection of matrix W among the nine candidate matrices and the subset of significant MEMs was conducted using the optimization method (listw.candidates function) available in the adespatial package (DRAY et al, 2019), considering only MEMs associated with positive eigenvalues.…”
Section: Agradecimentosmentioning
confidence: 99%