2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.cie.2023.109401
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimizing sustainable biomass–coal co-firing power plant location problem under ambiguous supply

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[33][34][35] For example, Duc et al 36 developed a stochastic and fuzzy optimization model for strategic and tactical management decisions of biomass plants in Thailand, exploring the impacts of uncertain demand on optimal strategies. Chen et al 37 determined a co-firing power plant-siting strategy for Heilongjiang Province, China, using a robust fuzzy optimization model taking into account supply price and quality uncertainties.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[33][34][35] For example, Duc et al 36 developed a stochastic and fuzzy optimization model for strategic and tactical management decisions of biomass plants in Thailand, exploring the impacts of uncertain demand on optimal strategies. Chen et al 37 determined a co-firing power plant-siting strategy for Heilongjiang Province, China, using a robust fuzzy optimization model taking into account supply price and quality uncertainties.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach offers a means for Indonesia to diminish its dependence on coal and transition toward cleaner energy sources, consequently curbing emissions and enhancing sustainability within its energy sector. Nevertheless, co-firing presents challenges as biomass performs less efficiently than coal, as highlighted in recent studies (Chen and Liu 2023;Hariana et al 2023;Shobar et al 2020;Sugiyono et al 2023). Additionally, biomass combustion is challenging to control due to its high moisture content and lower energy density (San Juan et al 2021), resulting in lower energy output than coal.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%