Optimizing stress responses with reappraisal and mindset interventions: an integrated model

Abstract

The dominant perspective in society is that stress has negative consequences, and not surprisingly, the vast majority of interventions for coping with stress focus on reducing the frequency or severity of stressors. However, the effectiveness of stress attenuation is limited because it is often not possible to avoid stressors, and avoiding or minimizing stress can lead individuals to miss opportunities for performance and growth. Thus, during stressful situations, a more efficacious approach is to optimize stress responses (i.e., promote adaptive, approach-motivated responses). Objectives and Conclusions: In this review, we demonstrate how stress appraisals (e.g., [Jamieson, J. P., Nock, M. K., & Mendes, W. B. (2012). Mind over matter: reappraising arousal improves cardiovascular and cognitive responses to stress. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 141(3), 417-422. doi: 10.1037/a0025719 ]) and stress mindsets (e.g., [Crum, A. J., Salovey, P., & Achor, S. (2013). Rethinking stress: The role of mindsets in determining the stress response. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104(4), 716-733. doi: 10.1037/a0031201 ]) can be used as regulatory tools to optimize stress responses, facilitate performance, and promote active coping. Respectively, these interventions invite individuals to (a) perceive stress responses as functional and adaptive, and (b) see the opportunity inherent in stress. We then propose a novel integration of reappraisal and mindset models to maximize the utility and effectiveness of stress optimization. Additionally, we discuss future directions with regard to how stress responses unfold over time and between people to impact outcomes in the domains of education, organizations, and clinical science.

Using social and behavioural science to support COVID-19 pandemic response

“…Fortuitously, the past twenty years of research on coping and stress suggest that it's not the type or amount of stress that determines its impact. Rather, mind-sets and situation appraisals about stress can alter its impact 238,239 . For instance, some research finds these mind-sets can increase the possibility of 'stress-related growth' , a phenomenon in which stressful experiences serve to increase physiological toughening [240][241][242] , help reorganize our priorities and can help lead to deeper relationships and a greater appreciation for life 243 .…”

An Entity Theory of Intelligence Predicts Higher Cortisol Levels When High School Grades Are Declining

“…A theoretical contribution of this research has been to continue the integration of two major research traditions-the implicit theories model of coping (Blackwell et al, 2007;Dweck, 1999;Dweck et al, 1995;Yeager & Dweck, 2012) and the BPS model of challenge and threat (Blascovich et al, 1999;Jamieson et al, 2018). This is valuable for three reasons.…”

The Effects of Stress Beliefs on Daily Affective Stress Responses

“…Daily positive and negative affect were assessed using the 10-item short form of the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule [52,53] (PANAS). The PANAS is one of the most widely used self-report questionnaires assessing positive (PANAS-P) and negative affect 11 (PANAS-N). Positive affect (e.g.…”