2021 IEEE 21st International Conference on Bioinformatics and Bioengineering (BIBE) 2021
DOI: 10.1109/bibe52308.2021.9635303
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimizing steady-state visual evoked potential classifiers for high performance and low computational costs in brain-computer interfacing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To the reduce the need for a high-end computer to handle the online processing nodes, the BCI classifier was chosen for its relatively good performance at low computational costs [79]. However, other classifiers may achieve an even better performance but will likely also require longer training sessions and more electrodes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…To the reduce the need for a high-end computer to handle the online processing nodes, the BCI classifier was chosen for its relatively good performance at low computational costs [79]. However, other classifiers may achieve an even better performance but will likely also require longer training sessions and more electrodes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The recursive STBF (R-STBF) is a computationally improved version of the STBF, and was chosen for this work due to its relatively high performance at a low computational cost [79]. It averages the segments recursively by applying an exponentially weighted moving average [79] rather than an equally-weighted average as used in earlier research [77], [80]. This reduced the computational cost and weighted the more recent data higher to allow a faster response [79].…”
Section: Brain-computer Interfacementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The study showed the greatest advantage of classifiers using the SLIC method, as it can split the computations into smaller time segments and become independent of the classification time window. In the study, it was shown to reduce the maximum computational delay time was reduced from 0.33ms to 0.03ms [161]. The study also showed that the previously designed FB-STBF achieved a similar performance but with a slightly higher computational delay (0.07ms).…”
Section: Steady State Visually Evoked Brain Machine Interfacementioning
confidence: 66%
“…However, this would require a classification algorithm to calculate the activation status of each button at a high rate with low computational delay and with high accuracy. Therefore, the classifier was further improved with a focus on reducing the required computing power in our later study [161]. Here a new version of the TRCA was also developed (the SLIC-TRCA) by implementing the SLIC method (similar to the STBF).…”
Section: Steady State Visually Evoked Brain Machine Interfacementioning
confidence: 99%