2016
DOI: 10.1007/s10951-016-0499-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimizing railway crew schedules with fairness preferences

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A CSP integration with the vehicle scheduling problem was developed in [69]. In [70], an application of the CSP with fairness preferences was explored. The crew pairing and fleet assignment problems were studied in [71].…”
Section: Real-world Applicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A CSP integration with the vehicle scheduling problem was developed in [69]. In [70], an application of the CSP with fairness preferences was explored. The crew pairing and fleet assignment problems were studied in [71].…”
Section: Real-world Applicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As an example, we found CrSP applied to railway. In [19], CrSP with attendance rates was solved; a version of CrSP with fairness preferences was solved in [20]. Crew scheduling problem applications were also found for airlines and bus transportation.…”
Section: Crew Scheduling Problemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With scheduling adherence in place, it becomes likely that some workers are stuck with shifts that are undesired, hence a need for fairness considerations in workforce scheduling [2,12]. Especially in developing countries, transportation structure, work culture, and diverse technical skills make fair schedules a must, for employee engagement.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That is, they define both an upper bound for the number of undesired shifts assigned to each worker and an objective term that minimizes the undesirability of assigned shifts. Jütte et al [12] aim to balance distribution of unpopular work for railway crews. Unfair schedules reduce employee engagement, low engagement causes employee turnover, and turnover brings extra operational cost on companies [29].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation