Optimizing prognostic factors of five-year survival in gastric cancer patients using feature selection techniques with machine learning algorithms: a comparative study

Abstract

Background Gastric cancer is the most common malignant tumor worldwide and a leading cause of cancer deaths. This neoplasm has a poor prognosis and heterogeneous outcomes. Survivability prediction may help select the best treatment plan based on an individual’s prognosis. Numerous clinical and pathological features are generally used in predicting gastric cancer survival, and their influence on the survival of this cancer has not been fully elucidated. Moreover, the five-year survivability prognosis performances of feature selection methods with machine learning (ML) classifiers for gastric cancer have not been fully benchmarked. Therefore, we adopted several well-known feature selection methods and ML classifiers together to determine the best-paired feature selection-classifier for this purpose. Methods This was a retrospective study on a dataset of 974 patients diagnosed with gastric cancer in the Ayatollah Talleghani Hospital, Abadan, Iran. First, four feature selection algorithms, including Relief, Boruta, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO), and minimum redundancy maximum relevance (mRMR) were used to select a set of relevant features that are very informative for five-year survival prediction in gastric cancer patients. Then, each feature set was fed to three classifiers: XG Boost (XGB), hist gradient boosting (HGB), and support vector machine (SVM) to develop predictive models. Finally, paired feature selection-classifier methods were evaluated to select the best-paired method using the area under the curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and f1-score metrics. Results The LASSO feature selection algorithm combined with the XG Boost classifier achieved an accuracy of 89.10%, a specificity of 87.15%, a sensitivity of 89.42%, an AUC of 89.37%, and an f1-score of 90.8%. Tumor stage, history of other cancers, lymphatic invasion, tumor site, type of treatment, body weight, histological type, and addiction were identified as the most significant factors affecting gastric cancer survival. Conclusions This study proved the worth of the paired feature selection-classifier to identify the best path that could augment the five-year survival prediction in gastric cancer patients. Our results were better than those of previous studies, both in terms of the time required to form the models and the performance measurement criteria of the algorithms. These findings may be very promising and can, therefore, inform clinical decision-making and shed light on future studies.

Personalized Plasma Medicine for Cancer: Transforming Treatment Strategies with Mathematical Modeling and Machine Learning Approaches

“…The evolution of AI, particularly with the integration of ML, has opened new possibilities in oncology, revolutionizing every facet of cancer care. It has significantly enhanced cancer diagnosis [90][91][92][93], prognosis [94][95][96][97][98], and the prediction of metastasis [99][100][101].…”

“…The evolution of AI, particularly with the integration of ML, has opened new possibilities in oncology, revolutionizing every facet of cancer care. It has significantly enhanced cancer diagnosis [90][91][92][93], prognosis [94][95][96][97][98], and the prediction of metastasis [99][100][101]. Treatment selection [102], efficacy [103][104][105], response assessment [106][107][108][109][110], and outcome prediction [111][112][113][114][115] have also seen remarkable enhancements.…”

Support Vector Machine Approaches for Tumor Classification and Survival Prediction in Cancer Patients: A Multi-Omics Data Analysis

“…Traditional approaches to cancer classification and forecast have regularly depended on histopathological highlights and clinical parameters, which may not completely capture the atomic complexities of basic tumorigenesis and malady movement. In later a long time, the approach of high-throughput omics innovations has revolutionized cancer research by empowering the comprehensive profiling of different natural atoms, counting DNA, RNA, proteins, and metabolites [1]. This multiomics approach offers exceptional openings to illustrate the atomic instruments driving cancer improvement and movement, as well as to recognize novel biomarkers for determination, guess, and treatment response.…”

A comparison of random survival forest and Cox regression for prediction of mortality in patients with hemorrhagic stroke

“…Traditional scoring systems commonly used in clinical practice include acute physiology and chronic health evaluation(APACHE II) [ 6 ], sequential organ failure assessment(SOFA) [ 7 ], Oxford acute severity of illness score(OASIS) [ 8 ], and simplified acute physiology score(SAPSII) [ 9 ], which include various variables with their respective point assignment scheme [ 10 ]. However, these traditional scores are applicable to a wide population, whose effectiveness in predicting specific diseases’ prognosis is not always satisfactory [ 11 , 12 ], the application of these scores in HS is limited. Many scholars have made efforts to construct predictive tools for HS.…”