2019 IEEE/ACM Workshop on Memory Centric High Performance Computing (MCHPC) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/mchpc49590.2019.00010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimizing Post-Copy Live Migration with System-Level Checkpoint Using Fabric-Attached Memory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The load balancer calls the process migration manager in traditional computing systems such as the cluster computing system. The status of the source and destination computing elements does not change in the process of implementing the process migration activities (Singh, G., & Singh, P., 2021;Chou, C. C., Chen, Y., Milojicic, D., Reddy, N., & Gratz, P., 2019, November). Therefore, the condition of matching the data structure of the migrant process to the corresponding data structure in the destination computing element be established.…”
Section: 𝐹𝐹(𝑙𝑙𝑙𝑙𝑙𝑙ℎ𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The load balancer calls the process migration manager in traditional computing systems such as the cluster computing system. The status of the source and destination computing elements does not change in the process of implementing the process migration activities (Singh, G., & Singh, P., 2021;Chou, C. C., Chen, Y., Milojicic, D., Reddy, N., & Gratz, P., 2019, November). Therefore, the condition of matching the data structure of the migrant process to the corresponding data structure in the destination computing element be established.…”
Section: 𝐹𝐹(𝑙𝑙𝑙𝑙𝑙𝑙ℎ𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In traditional expandable computing systems, if the status of the computing element changes due to the implementation of local activities, if the data structure of the migrating process is not matched with the state of the corresponding data structure in the destination computing element, the migration condition is not established (Stoyanov, R., & Kollingbaum, M. J., 2018, June). In the process migration manager of flushing, the and destination computing elements does not change in the process of implementing the process migration activities (Singh, G., & Singh, P., 2021;Chou, C. C., Chen, Y., Milojicic, D., Reddy, N., & Gratz, P., 2019, November). Therefore, the condition of matching the data structure of the migrant process to the corresponding data structure in the destination computing element be established.…”
Section: 𝐹𝐹(𝑙𝑙𝑙𝑙𝑙𝑙ℎ𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MOSIQS's target architecture is an array of PM devices distributed across hundreds of compute nodes. PM on each compute node is shared with other compute nodes via a shared PM pool abstraction via highspeed fabric attached memory (FAM) interconnect such as Gen-Z [6], [45]. Figure 2 depicts a high-level architectural overview of the MOSIQS.…”
Section: B Target Architecturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This algorithm reduced the total migration time but the downtime was almost the same with the original post-copy. Chou et al [78] proposed a hardware approach using high-performance Fabric-Attached Memory (FAM) to interconnect physical machines. Memory pages are dumped from source node to FAM during the migration, while the VM is running at destination node.…”
Section: Robust Migration Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%