1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0924-4247(98)00313-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimizing photodiode arrays for the use as retinal implants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For phase shift lithography, it would be quite difficult to engineer the phase mask to correct for the mechanical deformations, and thus elimination of the distortions would likely require manipulation of the exposure conditions. [22] Advances in microfabrication, namely in the area of nonplanar electronic devices, such as curved photodiode arrays for solar cell applications and synthetic retinal implants, [36][37][38][39][40] demand the ability to pattern metals, and other materials with electrical functionality, on geometrically diverse surfaces. The aforementioned fabrication methods are intended to replace traditional contact lithography by finding novel ways to use PDMS as a patterning element.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For phase shift lithography, it would be quite difficult to engineer the phase mask to correct for the mechanical deformations, and thus elimination of the distortions would likely require manipulation of the exposure conditions. [22] Advances in microfabrication, namely in the area of nonplanar electronic devices, such as curved photodiode arrays for solar cell applications and synthetic retinal implants, [36][37][38][39][40] demand the ability to pattern metals, and other materials with electrical functionality, on geometrically diverse surfaces. The aforementioned fabrication methods are intended to replace traditional contact lithography by finding novel ways to use PDMS as a patterning element.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10 In 2003, the company Retina Implant was formed from this group. As natural photoreceptors are much more efficient than photodiodes, the group chose to install an additional set of photodiodes that are irradiated by infrared light and generate electrical power to supply the amplification circuits in the retinal implant, 11 before developing an active power source (where the photodiodes are modulating current delivered from an external source) (Figure 1). In 2006, an active hybrid 1500 microphotodiode array (MPDA) was implanted into the subretinal space of six patients for 30 days (although one patient later refused to have it removed).…”
Section: Optoelectronic Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To overcome this problem, additional energy in the near infrared light was added to the spectrum of solar cells of the microphotodiode. 109 The infrared light is tolerated by the retina up to intensities of 200 mW/cm 2 , in contrary to the visible light (100 mW/cm 2 ). However, additional microelectronic circuitry to process and direct this power is necessary, and the concomitant heat dissipated by such a device may lead to retinal damage.…”
Section: How Much Heat Can the Device Produce?mentioning
confidence: 99%