2019
DOI: 10.11591/ijece.v9i6.pp5295-5303
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimizing PEMFC model parameters using ant lion optimizer and dragonfly algorithm: A comparative study

Abstract: This paper introduced two optimization algorithms which are Ant Lion Optimizer (ALO) and Dragonfly Algorithm (DA) for extracting the Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cell (PEMFC) polarization curve parameters. The results produced by both algorithms are being compared to observe their performance. As a results, the ALO shows great performance compared to DA. Furthermore, these results also being compared with the results of the other reported metaheuristics algorithms. The ALO and DA presented competitive results. Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Neglecting the concentration voltage drop for simplification, the E Nernst can be calculated as Equation (3). The further details can be found in [30]:…”
Section: Modeling Of Fuel Cellmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Neglecting the concentration voltage drop for simplification, the E Nernst can be calculated as Equation (3). The further details can be found in [30]:…”
Section: Modeling Of Fuel Cellmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So far, meta-heuristic algorithms have been roughly divided into four categories, which are based on biology, physics, sociology, and mathematics. In addition, many meta-heuristic algorithms have been applied to PEMFC parameter extraction, for example, antlion optimization algorithm (ALO) (Isa et al, 2019), particle swarm optimization algorithm (PSO) (Ye et al, 2009), biogeographybased optimization (BBO) (Gong and Cai, 2014), improved beetle antennae search (IBAS) (Sun et al, 2020), hybrid artificial bee colony algorithm (ABC) (Oliva et al, 2014), vortex search algorithm (VSA) (Fathy et al, 2020), differential evolution (DE) (Chakraborty et al, 2012), month flame optimizer algorithm (MFO) (Messaoud et al, 2020), multi-verse optimizer (MVO) (Zhao et al, 2016), gray wolf optimizer (GWO) (Yang et al, 2017), genetic algorithm (GA) (Ohenoja and Leiviskä, 2010), flower pollination algorithm (FPA) (Priya and Rajasekar, 2019), and equilibrium optimizer (EO) (Seleem et al, 2021).…”
Section: Parameter Extraction Using Only Meta-heuristic Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The applied methods may be divided into two groups; the first is based on only one algorithm, while the second is based on combining two techniques or more [8,17,26,27]. The first group of single algorithms such as adaptive differential evolution algorithm (ADE) [25,26], particle swarm optimisation, seeker optimisation algorithm (SOA) and genetic algorithm (GA) [18,21,27], Grey Wolf Optimisation (GWO) [8], Antlion Optimiser (ALO) [33] and Dragonfly Algorithm (DA) [34], Grasshopper Optimisation Algorithm (GOH) [16], Slap Swarm Optimiser (SSO) [17], Shark Smell Optimiser (SHSO) [35], JAYA algorithm [24], and Cuckoo Search (CS) [13] have been proposed to resolve the issue of parameter estimation of PEMFCs. The main objective of applying the reported methods is to obtain an accurate model of the PEMFC.…”
Section: Literature Review and Research Gapmentioning
confidence: 99%