2019
DOI: 10.1007/s12559-018-9613-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimizing Partition Granularity, Membership Function Parameters, and Rule Bases of Fuzzy Classifiers for Big Data by a Multi-objective Evolutionary Approach

Abstract: Background/Introduction -Classical data mining algorithms are considered inadequate to manage the volume, variety, velocity, and veracity aspects of Big Data. The advent of a number of open source cluster computing frameworks has opened new interesting perspectives for handling the volume and velocity features. In this context, thanks to their capability of coping with vague and imprecise information, distributed fuzzy models appear to be particularly suitable for handling the variety and veracity features of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…al algorithm achieve the worst results. On Sus dataset, the accuracies achieved [22,23,70] Global distributed Chi for Big Data CHI_BD [24] Distributed Fuzzy Associative Classifier based on Fuzzy Frequent Pattern DFAC-FFP [26] Distributed PAES with Rule and Condition Selection DPAES-RCS [27] Distributed PAES with Fuzzy Decision Tree and Granularity Learning DPAES-FDT-GL [29] Multi-way Fuzzy Decison Tree Multi-way FDT [25] Multi-way Fuzzy Decison Tree with Improved Fuzzy Partitioning FMDT l [30] by the remaining algorithms are similar. On HIG dataset, DFAC-FFP and DPAESs achieve accuracies up to 5% lower than the ones achieved by FDTs.…”
Section: Experimental Results: Some Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…al algorithm achieve the worst results. On Sus dataset, the accuracies achieved [22,23,70] Global distributed Chi for Big Data CHI_BD [24] Distributed Fuzzy Associative Classifier based on Fuzzy Frequent Pattern DFAC-FFP [26] Distributed PAES with Rule and Condition Selection DPAES-RCS [27] Distributed PAES with Fuzzy Decision Tree and Granularity Learning DPAES-FDT-GL [29] Multi-way Fuzzy Decison Tree Multi-way FDT [25] Multi-way Fuzzy Decison Tree with Improved Fuzzy Partitioning FMDT l [30] by the remaining algorithms are similar. On HIG dataset, DFAC-FFP and DPAESs achieve accuracies up to 5% lower than the ones achieved by FDTs.…”
Section: Experimental Results: Some Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The parameters of the fuzzy sets are learnt concurrently with the RB. Recently, a novel version of DPAES-RCS, called DPAES-FDT-GL has been presented by Barsacchi et al in [29]. Here, the initial rule set is generated adopting the distributed FDT discussed in "Distributed Fuzzy Decision Trees" section and introduced by Segatori et al in [26].…”
Section: Distributed Evolutionary Fuzzy Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…GaneshKumar et al, 2014), and comparison of fuzzy numbers (Matarazzo and Munda, 2001). As the selected papers' analysis shows, this issue is analysed in tandem with complexity issue of fuzzy rules, like in Rajeswari and Deisy (2019), Ravi and Khare (2018), Barsacchi et al (2019).…”
Section: Found Complexity Issues In Fis (Rq1)mentioning
confidence: 99%