2021
DOI: 10.3233/blc-200428
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimizing Nutritional Status in Patients Undergoing Radical Cystectomy: A Systematic Scoping Review

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Nutrition is a modifiable risk factor for patients undergoing multimodal oncologic interventions and plays a major supportive role in the setting of bladder cancer. For patients undergoing radical cystectomy (RC), malnutrition is associated with increased postoperative complications and mortality. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this scoping review is to characterize the role of nutritional interventions for patients undergoing RC for bladder cancer. METHODS: A multi-database systematic scoping review b… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a Systematic Review by Alan et al and a Cochrane review, the authors assigned a low quality of evidence to the study due to imprecision errors and the small sample size, which limited the study findings [ 21 , 22 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a Systematic Review by Alan et al and a Cochrane review, the authors assigned a low quality of evidence to the study due to imprecision errors and the small sample size, which limited the study findings [ 21 , 22 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such individuals often face nutritional challenges like appetite loss, nausea, vomiting, and alterations in taste perception [ 31 , 32 ], underscoring the importance of addressing nutritional needs as part of a comprehensive and targeted preoperative management. As elucidated by two studies, [ 33 , 34 ] oral supplements and immunonutrition emerge as promising treatments for mitigating postoperative complications and expediting recovery in RC patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Otherwise, Hamilton-Reeves' studies excluded malnourished patients according to weight loss and BMI criteria [39,40]. Two recent reviews [52,53] assigned a low quality of evidence to some of the described studies due to imprecision errors and small sample size. Unfortunately, the differences in terms of study design, clinical endpoints, sample size, timing of nutritional intervention, and type of immunonutrition supplements do not enable a proper comparison of the results or to draw solid conclusions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%