2007
DOI: 10.1650/0010-5422(2007)109[769:onsafs]2.0.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimizing Nest Survival and Female Survival: Consequences of Nest Site Selection for Canada Geese

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Selection of nest areas peaked at intermediate shrub heights similar to the head height of an incubating female houbara (measured from taxidermist-mounted decoys in non-alert position as 23-27 cm, n ¼ 4; but 5-10 cm taller when the neck is extended in upright alert posture), which suggests that females favor less exposed (more concealing) places that still provide good visibility, possibly to improve early detection of approaching danger. This way females can vacate the nest, slipping away rapidly but surreptitiously, before a potential predator arrives at the site (as frequently seen from nest cameras; Supplemental Material Video S2), simultaneously ensuring their own safety (Yang et al 2003, Miller et al 2007, Magaña et al 2010 and improving the daily survival of the nests (e.g., Lloyd 2004). Furthermore, nests placed in areas with taller shrubs had greater nest survival, indicating that taller shrubs did not compromise visual security, at least within the range of shrub heights at which nests were placed.…”
Section: The Role Of Vegetation Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Selection of nest areas peaked at intermediate shrub heights similar to the head height of an incubating female houbara (measured from taxidermist-mounted decoys in non-alert position as 23-27 cm, n ¼ 4; but 5-10 cm taller when the neck is extended in upright alert posture), which suggests that females favor less exposed (more concealing) places that still provide good visibility, possibly to improve early detection of approaching danger. This way females can vacate the nest, slipping away rapidly but surreptitiously, before a potential predator arrives at the site (as frequently seen from nest cameras; Supplemental Material Video S2), simultaneously ensuring their own safety (Yang et al 2003, Miller et al 2007, Magaña et al 2010 and improving the daily survival of the nests (e.g., Lloyd 2004). Furthermore, nests placed in areas with taller shrubs had greater nest survival, indicating that taller shrubs did not compromise visual security, at least within the range of shrub heights at which nests were placed.…”
Section: The Role Of Vegetation Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because the needs for concealment and a clear view for visual security (i.e. the ability of the incubating bird to observe potential danger at a large enough distance to allow it to escape) may conflict (Camp et al 2013), birds may potentially trade off these requirements when selecting a nest site (Götmark et al 1995, Lloyd 2004, Miller et al 2007, Magaña et al 2010.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, the most convincing cases of sympatric speciation in animals are related to divergence in oviposition preferences (Sorenson et al 2003;Coyne and Orr 2004;Machado 2005;Rønsted et al 2005;Althoff et al 2006). Oviposition preference is often presumed adaptive for good reason; it can dramatically affect individual fitness via both fecundity (Resetarits 1996) and adult survival (Scheirs et al 2000;Spencer 2002;Miller et al 2007). Many ecological studies, however, presume oviposition preference is adaptive without explicitly testing for a relationship between oviposition behaviors and fitness (Arlt and Pärt 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While many studies have conWrmed that nest microhabitat diVers from random (Martin 1998), habitat preferences seldom match actual nest predation risk (reviewed by Chalfoun and Martin 2007). This apparent paradox has been attributed in part to the highly variable nature of nest predation in space and time (Filliater et al 1994), but it has also been explained by a trade-oV between clutch and adult safety, where concealed nests may be less often detected by predators, but be more risky for parents by hindering escape (Götmark et al 1995;Wiebe and Martin 1998;Spencer 2002;Amat and Masero 2004;Miller et al 2007), helping to explain the diversity of nest sites selected (Öst et al 2008a). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%