2018
DOI: 10.1155/2018/9180757
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimizing Livers for Transplantation Using Machine Perfusion versus Cold Storage in Large Animal Studies and Human Studies: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Abstract: Background Liver allograft preservation frequently involves static cold storage (CS) and machine perfusion (MP). With its increasing popularity, we investigated whether MP was superior to CS in terms of beneficial outcomes. Methods Human studies and large animal studies that optimized livers for transplantation using MP versus CS were assessed (PubMed/Medline/EMBASE). Meta-analyses were conducted for comparisons. Study quality was assessed according to the Newcastle-Ottawa quality assessment scale and SYRCLE's… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(10,14) recOMMenDatiOn We suggest the use of HMP to reduce posttransplant EAD. (2D) taBle 3. literature search and evaluation for chapter 2: nMp Quality of evidence in the selected articles regarding NMP Quality of evidence in the selected articles for meta-analysis according to AMSTAR Jiang et al (47) Moderate…”
Section: Original Article | 1305mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(10,14) recOMMenDatiOn We suggest the use of HMP to reduce posttransplant EAD. (2D) taBle 3. literature search and evaluation for chapter 2: nMp Quality of evidence in the selected articles regarding NMP Quality of evidence in the selected articles for meta-analysis according to AMSTAR Jiang et al (47) Moderate…”
Section: Original Article | 1305mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, only 2 prospective RCTs (29,38) and 3 prospective studies (26,30,39) comparing NMP and SCS have been published, whereas other available articles were small case series or case reports. (27,28,(31)(32)(33)(34)(35)(36)(37)(40)(41)(42)(43)(44)(45)(46)(47)(48)(49)(50)(51)(52) Also, no national or international registries exist (Table 3).…”
Section: What Is the Impact Of The Nmp Versus Scs In Terms Of Graft Amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In comparative studies, in light of similar rates of transplant-related (i.e., artery thrombosis) and unrelated (i.e., bleeding) complications (15,24,30,32,35,37), MP allowed for prolonged total graft preservation time (15,35), a 10%-50% reduced risk for EAD (7,17,24,30,36,37,41,47), 7%-15% less IRI (7,17,28,32,39,42), 7-50% fewer ischemic biliary complications (IBC) (7,15,17,24,30,31,36,37,47), comparable (22,24) or improved 1-year graft (30,47) and patient survival (30,35), and up to a 50% lower discard rate (31,35,43). Hospital stay was not longer for MP patients (15,24,30), and technical failures were anecdotal (36). Costs of MP have limitedly been investigated in two studies only (13,21).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• No increased complication rate (15,24,30,32,35,37) • Prolonged total graft preservation time (15,35) • 10-50% reduced risk for EAD (7,17,24,30,36,37,41,47) • 7-15% less IRI (7,17,28,32,39,42) • 7-50% fewer IBC (7,15,17,24,30,31,36,37,47) • Comparable (22,24) or improved 1-year graft (30,47) and patient survival (30,35) • Up to a 50% lower discard rate (31,35,43) Economic(al) technology. As clinicians, we are challenged to think through all these methodological issues related to MP technology and build empirical evidence in our future practice.…”
Section: Clinicalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, perfusion machines have appeared on the market, which replace the simple hypothermic box and perfuse the organ with an organ preservation solution at +4 °C, in this case called machine perfusion solution (MPS). Both techniques are used in clinical practice, and in both cases, the organ is in contact with a cold solution [ 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%