2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2011.10.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimizing land cover classification accuracy for change detection, a combined pixel-based and object-based approach in a mountainous area in Mexico

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
62
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 148 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
4
62
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With the increasing applications of the object-based approach on widely available high-spatial resolution imagery, therefore, it would be interesting to test the object-based updating/backdating approach for change analysis using high-spatial resolution image data. The BOB approach had similar accuracies for land cover classification and change analysis with those from previous studies (Aguirre -Gutiérrez, Seijmonsbergen, & Duivenvoorden, 2012;Chen, Chen, Shi, & Yamaguchi, 2012;Desclee, Bogaert, & Defourny, 2006). But we did not conduct any manual editing for refinement, and did not use any ancillary data to aid in the change detection and classification.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…With the increasing applications of the object-based approach on widely available high-spatial resolution imagery, therefore, it would be interesting to test the object-based updating/backdating approach for change analysis using high-spatial resolution image data. The BOB approach had similar accuracies for land cover classification and change analysis with those from previous studies (Aguirre -Gutiérrez, Seijmonsbergen, & Duivenvoorden, 2012;Chen, Chen, Shi, & Yamaguchi, 2012;Desclee, Bogaert, & Defourny, 2006). But we did not conduct any manual editing for refinement, and did not use any ancillary data to aid in the change detection and classification.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…The research result that object-based classifier give the best overall accuracy in 86.2%. Similar research are also done by (Bruce, 2008), (Oruc et al, 2004), (Xiaoxia et al, 2005), (Qian et al, 2007), (Gholoobi et al, 2010), (Weih and Riggan, 2010), (Avci et al, 2011), (Aguirre-Gutiérrez et al, 2012), which compared pixelbased and object-based method. The result showed that objectbased better than pixel-based method with varying percentage of accuracy.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…These features are extremely relevant for classification purposes and are lacking within traditional pixel-based classification methods (Hay and Castilla 2008;Blaschke, 2010). Assigning a larger weight to particular layers increases the influence of these layers on the segmentation boundaries (Aguirre-Gutierrez et al, 2012). In consequence, the bands and indices that typically show a good distinction between water bodies and other landscape elements (NDWI, NDVI, NIR1, NIR2, PAN) were given a larger weight in the segmentation process (a weight of 4 instead of 1 for all other layers).…”
Section: Object-based Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The compactness factor controls for the smoothness of the objects borders (eCognition, 2013). The ESP Tool selected the most suitable scale parameter based on the PAN band (Dragut et al, 2010), while the shape and compactness parameters were determined by a trial-and-error approach and visual interpretation of the results (similar to the procedure followed by Im et al (2008), Halabisky et al (2011) and Aguirre-Gutierrez et al (2012)). The optimal scale (14), shape (0.5) and compactness (0.5) parameters were chosen in such a way that no undersegmentation occurred.…”
Section: Object-based Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%