2017 18th International Radar Symposium (IRS) 2017
DOI: 10.23919/irs.2017.8008123
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimizing labelling on radar-based grid maps using active learning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results obtained in [11], as well as the results from [2] (if we include the tracking system to study multiple frames), achieved a higher accuracy than our proposed framework. However, [11] is able to achieve these results through an iterative approach where human interaction is still required to manually label part of the dataset in each iteration. At the same time, the technique was not tested with multi-class data, in contrast with our technique which is able to detect multiple targets in the same frame.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 65%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The results obtained in [11], as well as the results from [2] (if we include the tracking system to study multiple frames), achieved a higher accuracy than our proposed framework. However, [11] is able to achieve these results through an iterative approach where human interaction is still required to manually label part of the dataset in each iteration. At the same time, the technique was not tested with multi-class data, in contrast with our technique which is able to detect multiple targets in the same frame.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…On the other hand, when using the proposed autolabeling framework, the required time for the same task was reduced to 6 minutes (us- Technique initial mAP Average speed Our approach 82.056% 3 frames/sec K. Patel et al [2] 65.30% 2 frames/sec F. Nobis et al [1] 57.50% -T.Y. Lim et al [16] 73.5% 40 frames/sec T. Winterling et al [11] 94.93% - ing a GPU platform). Therefore, the time reduction achieve in this dataset was 96.76% respect to the manual labeling process.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…One solution to this problem is to find models that require less data to converge, i.e., using classification models with small amount of training coefficients as in [1]. Moreover, techniques such as active learning were found to be able to reduce the required amount of data for radar-based classification tasks [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%