2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.infrared.2019.103047
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimizing input data for training an artificial neural network used for evaluating defect depth in infrared thermographic nondestructive testing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The characterization errors were in the range of 6 to 31%, and in the most cases did not exceed 20%l. This is in good agreement with earlier published results [14,15,31,34,35].…”
Section: Data Processing and Nn Trainingsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The characterization errors were in the range of 6 to 31%, and in the most cases did not exceed 20%l. This is in good agreement with earlier published results [14,15,31,34,35].…”
Section: Data Processing and Nn Trainingsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…For creating and training the NN, the TensorFlow algorithm set was used, and the NN training quality was estimated by applying a loss function. It was shown elsewhere that an increase in the number of NN hidden layers improves the accuracy of evaluating the depth of deeper defects [35]. In this study, the criterion for choosing the number of layers was a compromise between the accuracy of defect characterization and computation time.…”
Section: Data Processing and Nn Trainingmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Previous studies have demonstrated that needless data could restrict the effectiveness of model training (Chulkov et al, 2019;Cova and Pais, 2019;Xu et al, 2019). In contrast, in the classification model, the optimal size (m, n) of the input varied depending on the structure based on whether the CNN structures adopted a skip connection or a parallel CNN layer (He et al, 2016b;Szegedy et al, 2016).…”
Section: Optimal Input Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, indirect detection requires the adoption of specific devices to measure material deterioration using different nondestructive technologies (e.g., eddy current, infrared, and ultrasonic thickness testing) [10,11]. The main advantage of indirect detection nondestructive testing (NDT) is a higher probability of detection and quantification of corrosion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%