2020 IEEE International Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium Workshops (IPDPSW) 2020
DOI: 10.1109/ipdpsw50202.2020.00040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimizing High-Performance Computing Systems for Biomedical Workloads

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is partly due to the factors discussed in §3.4. Other barriers to quantum advantages include (i) the sophistication of existing classical heuristic algorithms and the inherent parallelism of many of the problems they solve, (ii) the scale of both existing classical hardware and practical problem instances within the context of contemporary research [ 385 ], (iii) the broad institutional support and incumbent advantage benefiting existing classical approaches (including extensive clinical validation in the medical setting), and (iv) the likely precondition of FTQC to realize polynomial advantages based on amplitude amplification in practice [ 41 ]. Thus, while current research in this direction shows long-term promise and should be explored further, many of these quantum advantages appear unlikely to be practical in the near term.…”
Section: Future Prospects In Biology and Medicinementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is partly due to the factors discussed in §3.4. Other barriers to quantum advantages include (i) the sophistication of existing classical heuristic algorithms and the inherent parallelism of many of the problems they solve, (ii) the scale of both existing classical hardware and practical problem instances within the context of contemporary research [ 385 ], (iii) the broad institutional support and incumbent advantage benefiting existing classical approaches (including extensive clinical validation in the medical setting), and (iv) the likely precondition of FTQC to realize polynomial advantages based on amplitude amplification in practice [ 41 ]. Thus, while current research in this direction shows long-term promise and should be explored further, many of these quantum advantages appear unlikely to be practical in the near term.…”
Section: Future Prospects In Biology and Medicinementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The intensive workloads of AI operating on big data demand computational resources that must be able to achieve extreme scale and high performance while being cost-effective and environmentally sustainable [39]. High performance computing (HPC), or supercomputing, architectures are facilitating the deployment of pioneering AI applications in biomedicine [40,41]. In this view, HPC represents a critical capacity to gain competitive advantages, including not only faster and more complex computation schemes but also at lower costs and higher impact.…”
Section: The Role Of Ai In Cancer Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is partly due to the factors discussed in Section 2.4. Other barriers to quantum advantages include i) the sophistication of existing classical heuristic algorithms and the inherent parallelism of many of the problems they solve, ii) the scale of both existing classical hardware and practical problem instances within the context of contemporary research [410], iii) the broad institutional support and incumbent advantage benefiting existing classical approaches (including extensive clinical validation in the medical setting), and iv) the likely precondition of FTQC to realize polynomial advantages based on amplitude amplification in practice [59]. Thus, while current research in this direction shows long term promise and should be explored further, many of these quantum advantages appear unlikely to be practical the near term.…”
Section: Prospects For Bioinformaticsmentioning
confidence: 99%