Proceedings of the 2004 ACM SIGPLAN/SIGBED Conference on Languages, Compilers, and Tools for Embedded Systems 2004
DOI: 10.1145/997163.997195
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimizing for space and time usage with speculative partial redundancy elimination

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Significant performance gains can be expected from these optimizations, leveraging the benefits of a more application-specific PRE technique that may be derived from our algorithm. Furthermore, our algorithm may find applications in some embedded applications [Scholz et al 2004] where performance improvements can be beneficial. One future work is to evolve MC-PRE into a more application-specific PRE technique in these research areas so that more significant performance gains can be obtained.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Significant performance gains can be expected from these optimizations, leveraging the benefits of a more application-specific PRE technique that may be derived from our algorithm. Furthermore, our algorithm may find applications in some embedded applications [Scholz et al 2004] where performance improvements can be beneficial. One future work is to evolve MC-PRE into a more application-specific PRE technique in these research areas so that more significant performance gains can be obtained.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of the local heuristics used, both algorithms are not computationally optimal. Later, computationally optimal results are achieved by the three different algorithms described in Bodik [1999], Cai and Xue [2003], and Scholz et al [2004], which all rely on finding a minimum cut to obtain the required insertion points. However, none of these three algorithms is also lifetime optimal due to the arbitrary minimum cuts chosen in their algorithms.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…There are three computationally optimal algorithms for speculative PRE [1,4,25]. Later we also developed a lifetime optimal algorithm [26].…”
Section: Related Work and Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%